Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - arthurk

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 589
1
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: Latin 1344 (again) Scottish Roll
« on: Sunday 05 May 24 14:22 BST (UK)  »
From the context, I think that phrase is

o(mn)iu(m) alia(rum) t(er)ra(rum) n(ost)ra(rum) - "of all our other lands"

There are various other contractions, most marked by a horizontal line above a letter or through an ascender. In this case, though, there's a special symbol for the -rum ending, also seen just before the end of the non-italic text.

2
Could you make sense out of tresbage on p. 127? I concluded, it could be leafage – the only thing that made sense to me in the context?

I think it's 'herbage' - and in this case written correctly. I wouldn't consider it to be an everyday word, but maybe it was more common then. Some of these more obscure words probably survived longer than they might have done because writers often used 'elegant variation', preferring unusual synonyms and circumlocution to simply using the most obvious word more than once.

3
...viewing the steps

»steps« at that place in the sentece in my opinion would be too far from context. there were no steps mentioned elsewhere in connection with the temple.

Having read the full transcription, I now wonder if mckha was right after all:
I wondered if “etope”” was slope.

I did too for a time, but the tall letter is crossed like a 't'.

Yes - but this is a document that has been copied from another document. So it could be a mistranscription. Slope makes sense if you consider the description of viewing petrifried wood which could be on a slope of a river bank for instance.

The temple is on a "hilldoh", which I think must be a hilltop. It's surrounded by something which is prevented from falling by these small palings made of petrified wood. For someone approaching and seeing them for the first time, "the first impression left upon the mind in viewing the slope" would make good sense.

It's most unfortunate that a word seems to have been missed out ("a little ... raised all round it") so we can't really envisage the scene. Or can we make "raised" into a noun that would fit the context?

4
From the first one:

"bear" - I can make better sense of what follows if it's "hear", but as a misspelling of "here".


I like your suggestion there. Also: one has to keep in mind, that the punctuation is more or less missing. In that way a full stop behind »bear« is possible too.

So the sentence could go even in the way of: »…by which this conversion of wood into stone <verb> here[.] the first impression left upon the mind…«

Another thought, which involves a gross misreading, is that 'scites bear' is actually 'takes place'. (s=t, ci=a, t=k; b=p, e=l, r=ce)

One of these confusions in a word might be easily spotted, but here it would mean having a whole lot of them all together. I wonder...?


5
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: Deciphering Cause of Death
« on: Saturday 04 May 24 11:13 BST (UK)  »
Tabes mesenterica
4 months
no medical
attendant

If I've understood it correctly, Tabes mesenterica is a form of tuberculosis. An online search should tell you more, or others here may be better able to explain it.

PS - welcome to RootsChat!

6
I wondered if “etope”” was slope.

I did too for a time, but the tall letter is crossed like a 't'.

7
World War Two / Re: Help with missing information on dads army career.
« on: Friday 03 May 24 20:39 BST (UK)  »
There's a number embossed at the top - could that be a date, or is it the number of the guard's clipper?

Whatever it is, the design and style of railway tickets change from time to time, so there might be some experts who could date that ticket even though it might not have a printed date.

8
World War Two / Re: Help with missing information on dads army career.
« on: Friday 03 May 24 20:13 BST (UK)  »
Is there a date on the train ticket? Norway was under Nazi occupation from the spring of 1940 until May 1945, so a journey in that period would have been unlikely.

9
The Lighter Side / Re: Twitchels
« on: Friday 03 May 24 19:56 BST (UK)  »
Growing up in probably a different part of Yorkshire, I don't think I heard of twitchells. Ginnels, yes, but we'd just as often say snicket:

https://archive.org/details/cu31924088038421/page/580/mode/2up?view=theater

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 589