1
Armed Forces / Re: Faked Victorian Medals
« on: Saturday 04 February 23 02:29 GMT (UK) »Obviously today we are familiar with the flourishing trade in 'replacement' medals which I suppose could be described as fake, although they are unlikely to fool an expert phaleristicist. While I don't know if such practices were widespread in the nineteenth or early twentieth century, I'm sure they went on. Incidentally while it was not an offence to sell your medals, it was an offence under section 197 (2) of the Army Act 1955 to buy or trade in medals, except after the death of the person to whom the medal was awarded.
The Armed Forces Act 2006 replaced the three separate Service Discipline Acts with a single statute. However, section 197 of the 1955 Act was not reproduced in the 2006 Act and its provisions were repealed in 2009. As a result, no specific offences now exist relating to the unauthorised wearing, or false representation of entitlement to wear military decorations or medals.
http://businesscrimeblog.practicallaw.com/expose-walter-mitty-but-do-not-prosecute-him/
As the whole of section 197 was removed the selling and buying of medals, even when the recipient is still alive, is no longer an offence. Otherwise places like Dix Noonan Webb would be in deep doo-doo for selling medals from living recipients who received them in recent campaigns,