Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Spikey68

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 36
1
Armed Forces / Re: Faked Victorian Medals
« on: Saturday 04 February 23 02:29 GMT (UK)  »
Obviously today we are familiar with the flourishing trade in 'replacement' medals which I suppose could be described as fake, although they are unlikely to fool an expert phaleristicist. While I don't know if such practices were widespread in the nineteenth or early twentieth century, I'm sure they went on. Incidentally while it was not an offence to sell your medals, it was an offence under section 197 (2) of the Army Act 1955 to buy or trade in medals, except after the death of the person to whom the medal was awarded.

The Armed Forces Act 2006 replaced the three separate Service Discipline Acts with a single statute.  However, section 197 of the 1955 Act was not reproduced in the 2006 Act and its provisions were repealed in 2009. As a result, no specific offences now exist relating to the unauthorised wearing, or false representation of entitlement to wear military decorations or medals.

http://businesscrimeblog.practicallaw.com/expose-walter-mitty-but-do-not-prosecute-him/

As the whole of section 197 was removed the selling and buying of medals, even when the recipient is still alive, is no longer an offence.  Otherwise places like Dix Noonan Webb would be in deep doo-doo for selling medals from living recipients who received them in recent campaigns,

2
World War Two / Re: Help deciphering RAF WW2 Service Record
« on: Thursday 11 March 21 02:03 GMT (UK)  »
3 RC - No 3 Recruit Centre
Res - Reserve (probably because he had to wait until there was remove for the next batch of recruits)
10 (S)RC - 10 Signals Recruit Centre, Blackpool
3 SS - No 3 Signals School
2 PDC - No 2 Personnel Despatch Centre Morecombe
1 AGS - No 1 Air Gunnery School (he may have been assigned there as wireless operator rather than as a trainee).
5 PDC - No 5 Personnel Despatch Centre

India

CTC Bombay - Combined Training Centre (RAF Section)
190 (Assault) Wing
CBMH - Combined British Military Hospital (I can’t make out the name)
RAF Station Manipur (Imphal)
IBGH - Indian British General Hospital

HE - Home Embarkation

9 PDC - No 9 Personnel Despatch Centre
I cannot make out the writing here
100 PDC -  No 100 Personnel Despatch Centre (discharged from service)

3
Armed Forces / Re: Purchasing NZ WW2 records
« on: Monday 22 February 21 02:52 GMT (UK)  »
Does the same go for RNZAF records for WW2 ?   Have they been digitised ?
thanks Pete

I would also recommend contacting Errol Martyn on rafcoomands.com/forum He is the expert on RNZAF personnel, and has done extensive research in the archives. He is the author of the For Your Tomorrow trilogy on New Zealand airmen who died in service (plus  other books).

4
World War Two / Re: Help with deciphering records
« on: Saturday 06 February 21 23:29 GMT (UK)  »
Interesting because when we wanted my grandfathers they refused me and my mum and aunt had to apply.  They stated closest living family member only

The 25 year rule applies for non-NoK

In recognition of the duty of care owed to the family of the deceased subject, for a period of 25 years following the date of death of the service person, the MOD will (if held) disclose:

    surname
    forename
    rank
    service number
    regiment/corps
    place of birth
    age
    date of birth
    date of death where this occurred in service
    the date an individual joined the service
    the date of leaving
    good conduct medals (for example, Long Service and Good Conduct Medal (LS&GCM)), any orders of chivalry and gallantry medals (decorations of valour) awarded, some of which may have been announced in the London Gazette.

After the 25 year period, MOD will also disclose the additional information (if held) below:

    the units in which he/she served
    the dates of this service and the locations of those units
    the ranks in which the service was carried out and details of campaign medals awarded.

Within the 25 year period, where the consent of the immediate next of kin has been given, the additional information above will be released to a third party applicant.


https://www.gov.uk/guidance/request-records-of-deceased-service-personnel

5
I do not believe the gentleman is Indian. He maybe a bit tanned but the features do not look Indian. And most British (Raj) clubs and R&R centres did not permit Indians in, regardless of their service or rank.

May I share this photo on a FB group I admin that focuses on the RAF in India and Burma? Or would you care to share it in the group. We have a number of experts who maybe able to ID some of the pilots (there are also army personnel and at least a couple of airborne).

Search for "RAF in Burma India & SEAC - WW2 Research"

6
World War Two / Re: Could LAC Donald Pike have been a rear gunner?
« on: Thursday 01 October 20 16:47 BST (UK)  »
The minimum rank for Airman (ie. not a Commissioned Officer) Aircrew is Sergeant.

Not so, the air gunners on the Fairy Battles in 1940 were LAC's.

Michael.

Prior to 27 May 1940, aircrew could and were of LAC rank. On that date the RAF ordered that the minimum rank for aircrew should be Sergeant (mainly because they got better treatment as POWs). In the first few months of the war many airgunners were groundcrew who volunteered for aircrew duties on a mission to mission basis, and paid "flying pay" of an extra 1 shilling a 6d. As needs, skills and activity increased, all aircrew roles became specialist trades. A telegraphist, if mustered for aircrew, would probably have been trained as a Wireless Operator, rather than an airgunner.


7
World War Two / Re: Deciphering Army Service History
« on: Monday 17 August 20 05:46 BST (UK)  »
I get " Please sign in or register to access this page. " when I click the links

8
Armed Forces / Re: Suez Awards 1956
« on: Monday 10 August 20 19:57 BST (UK)  »
For Naval gallantry awards

https://www.naval-history.net/WXLG-Suez.htm#medals

For army and air force, scroll to the bottom of the above list and you'll find a link to the LG issue for the operation.

9
Armed Forces / Re: Suez Awards 1956
« on: Monday 10 August 20 19:45 BST (UK)  »
The General Service Medal and Naval GSM both have "Near East" Clasp for the Suez Crisis. Not to be confused with the "Canal Zone" clasp for earlier Suez service.

As to a comprehensive list, I don't know.

Gallantry awards were gazetted.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 36