Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - annesthreads

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 ... 15
55
Ancestral Family Tree DNA Testing / Re: Siblings' DNA
« on: Tuesday 28 April 15 19:30 BST (UK)  »
Thanks Craclyn - glad I'd understood that correctly! I have no male relatives at all - my father's generation have all died  and I have no brothers, cousins, even second cousins  - there are only females in my generation. So I'm grateful to the autosomal test, as being my only way into my paternal line. If my sisters could provide me with more clues, I need to persuade them to be tested!

56
Ancestral Family Tree DNA Testing / Re: Ancestry DNA results
« on: Tuesday 28 April 15 19:26 BST (UK)  »
Apparently GEDmatch is running at 7-10 days, but I've had results from FTDNA. There weren't many matches - less than two pages - but they're closer than the Ancestry ones, 2nd-4th cousin, and I can actually identify which branch of the family is involved for some of the entries. Still all in the US though, which is disappointing, though there's a branch of my mother's family that it might be interesting to follow up and another lead for the Irish branch who are proving so elusive. However I'll wait and see what GEDmatch produces, as $39 seems a lot for the number of matches available.

57
Ancestral Family Tree DNA Testing / Siblings' DNA
« on: Tuesday 28 April 15 19:21 BST (UK)  »
My very un-science-minded brain is fried after several hours trying to understand the principles behind the Ancestry DNA test and its implications for my family history, not to mention uploading the data onto FTDNA  and GEDmatch.

One thing I'm still not clear about: would it be worth my sisters also getting the autosomal test? I'm not sure I've understood correctly, but am I right in thinking that a sibling's DNA might turn up other matches?

58
Ancestral Family Tree DNA Testing / Re: Ancestry DNA results
« on: Tuesday 28 April 15 18:36 BST (UK)  »
If you join gedmatch.com (its free) you can download your results there and get alternative analysis which may or may not confirm what Ancestry told you. It has a few other tools too that you can play with

Thanks David. I've just uploaded the results onto GEDmatch and FTDNA: I'll decide whether to pay for the latter when I see what they send me.

59
Ancestral Family Tree DNA Testing / Ancestry DNA results
« on: Tuesday 28 April 15 17:26 BST (UK)  »
I've just received my results and am fairly bemused  at the moment. They are:

Irish:39%
Western Europe:35%
Great Britain:22%
Iberian Peninsula:2%
European Jewish:1%
Italy/Greece:<1%
One of my paternal grandparents was  Irish, and there's a bit of Irish on my mother's side, but most of the lines for the other 3 grandparents are English. I'm guessing that the Western European may be explained by the fact that quite a lot of my mother's family came from Suffolk and south Lincolnshire  - Anglo Saxon influence? But how far back are these tests looking? eg could Iberian Peninsula be early  migration into Ireland, or much later shipwrecked Armada ships? (My Dad always reckoned that was the explanation of his very dark colouring!). Is Great Britain indicative of pre-Roman, pre-Anglo Saxon ancestry?
The matches I've looked at so far are disappointing: I can find no obvious links as far as surname or area are concerned, even though I've got my lines fairly complete to 4 or 5 generations.
A distant Canadian cousin (we think) did the test at the same time. We met through Ancestry, have the same surname and our families come from the same part of Northern Ireland. She's done the work on the Irish side of the family, but hasn't been able to definitely prove the link between us because of the gaps in the Irish records. Her test result is totally different, with only 10% Irish and an above-average Great Britain score, which seems bizarre, given that she knows for sure that her family is Irish. Might it indicate Scottish emigration to Ireland? (though the surname is  Irish, not Scots).
The test has posed far more questions than its answered, but nevertheless it's fascinating. I've wanted to do this for years, but have had to wait for the cost to come down.

60
Breconshire / Re: Abergwesin
« on: Tuesday 27 January 15 17:21 GMT (UK)  »
Thankyou very much, George. No, being new to Welsh genealogy, I hadn't appreciated that the surname might appear differently. Very useful to know - thankyou. I'll take a look at the info you've set out. All much appreciated!

61
Breconshire / Re: Abergwesin
« on: Monday 26 January 15 13:42 GMT (UK)  »
Thankyou very much - no hurry. I'd rather put that family to one side after all my struggles with them! But it would be interesting to try...

62
Breconshire / Re: Abergwesin
« on: Sunday 25 January 15 17:45 GMT (UK)  »
I have access to a copy of the Register for Pantycelin Methodist Chapel in Abergwesin which covers most of the 19th century, and I'm willing to do 'look-ups' fi you think your ancestors might be hidden-away there.

Thankyou. If you were able to check for the Richards family detailed in the post above yours, that would be a huge help, as I've got no further with them.

63
The Common Room / Re: Ever wondered what accent your ancestors had?
« on: Thursday 30 October 14 10:06 GMT (UK)  »
Another one from my family - there's the rather odd name Saycell. I wondered, and someone else later confirmed, that this was originally Cecil. Illiterate people were presumably completely reliant on enumerators, clergymen and other officials to write their names down correctly, and given that local accents were much stronger and diverse than now, and said officials came from a different class and probably often locality, it's not surprising that spellings and even the actual name often got changed.

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 ... 15