The 1871 census return in full is:
RG10 Piece 4003 Folio 68 Page 36
181 Stretford Road, Hulme, Lancashire
Frederick Hullah Head Mar 39 Currier London, Middlesex
Alice (née Anderson) Wife Mar 40 Yorkshire, Ripon
Sarah Anderson Sister-in-Law Unm 42 Formerly Laundress Yorkshire, Ripon
George Anderson Nephew Unm 15 Currier apprentice Yorkshire, Ripon
I know that Alice and Sarah are sisters, and that Sarah never married. Sarah stayed with Alice and her husband, and both Alice and Sarah died within weeks of each other.
The census seems to indicate that George was possibly Sarah's illegitimate son, but on his marriage certificate to his second wife, Alice Foster, his father is down as Henry Anderson, Alice and Sarah's brother. It's a pity George's not on the 1861 census, unless I'm looking in the wrong place.
Henry married in 1854 - I have a copy of the certificate. However, his first child (if this wasn't George) wasn't born until 1859. That's quite a long gap, so it's entirely possible there were other earlier children, and possibly George was one of them. Could George have been farmed out because Henry and his wife couldn't afford to keep him?
As George was living in Hulme in 1871, but had moved back to Ripon by 1880, I could, I suppose, whittle down the 142 possible George Anderson marriages by only considering those in Lancashire and Yorkshire. That still leaves a lot, though. If we assume he married after the age of 18, we can whittle down the number a few more by only considering marriages between 1874 and 1880.
I though of looking for Anderson deaths, but there's an awful lot, so finding the right one is just as much a needle in a haystack.
On the website where you order the certificates, I've spotted that you can request look-ups to make sure that you get the certificate you want. Has anyone used this facility, and if so, what information is needed to make best use of it?
There is a marriage entry for George Henry Anderson in 1871 in Chorlton. Since this is the same district where his aunt's Alice and Sarah had their deaths registered, is this a reasonable possiblity, although George would have been only 16-17? Did people get married that young in the mid-late 1800s?
David