Author Topic: Broderick 1891 - could someone please clarify?  (Read 1081 times)

Offline Sandra Parker

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 272
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio
    • View Profile
Broderick 1891 - could someone please clarify?
« on: Sunday 02 March 08 03:11 GMT (UK) »
James, Elizabeth & Henry Broderick, 11&12 Prison Street, St. Johns, Guildford, London RG 12/556 Page 13 (10?).
Can someone please clarify James occupation?
?? Clerk  H M Convict Service.
And Henry was an 'imbecile from childhood from vaccination and teething' ????? Would appreciate knowing what vaccinations would have been around in the 1870's and if they were generally available. Or was it possibly something the family added in rationalising his condition.
Sandra
London: Bradford, Van der Velden, Peill, Harris
Norfolk: Chilvers, Sparkes
IOW: Barton, Please, Shiner
Cheshire: Parker. Bradley, Hooley
Staffordshire: Buckley, Hargreaves

Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: Broderick 1891 - could someone please clarify?
« Reply #1 on: Sunday 02 March 08 09:17 GMT (UK) »
The 1840 Smallpox Vaccination Act made free vaccination available as a charge on the poor rates. Vaccination was, thereby, the first free health service provided through legislation on a national scale and available to all.
It was only in 1853 that the Vaccination Act introduced compulsory vaccination for all infants within four months of birth, but it contained no powers of enforcement. The 1867 Vaccination Act made vaccination compulsory for all infants, and set out procedures for the registration of successful vaccinations.

The Act came into force on 1st. January 1868, when it became a criminal offence for a parent to continually deny a child vaccination up to the age of 14 years, and to be liable to a penalty, on summary proceedings, of 20 shillings for so doing. The justices could make an order for the vaccination of a child under 14.
The Act required that on a child being registered, or within seven days, the registrar was to give a notice to the parent, or other person, to have the child vaccinated within three months. A certificate of vaccination was to be sent to the Registrar and a duplicate given to the parent.


Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Sandra Parker

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 272
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio
    • View Profile
Re: Broderick 1891 - could someone please clarify?
« Reply #2 on: Sunday 02 March 08 09:37 GMT (UK) »
Thank you very much for that Stan. That is very interesting.
I've included the original comment.
Sandra
London: Bradford, Van der Velden, Peill, Harris
Norfolk: Chilvers, Sparkes
IOW: Barton, Please, Shiner
Cheshire: Parker. Bradley, Hooley
Staffordshire: Buckley, Hargreaves

Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: Broderick 1891 - could someone please clarify?
« Reply #3 on: Sunday 02 March 08 09:54 GMT (UK) »
Hi Sandra,
I think it is Pl-- Under Clerk, but if he was a "Imbecile" from childhood it seems unlikely that he would be able to do a clerk's job as we understand it.

Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline Sandra Parker

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 272
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio
    • View Profile
Re: Broderick 1891 - could someone please clarify?
« Reply #4 on: Sunday 02 March 08 12:49 GMT (UK) »
Sorry for the confusion. The father James, is the clerk, the son Henry had the vaccination. Mum is Elizabeth. Can't add the whole pic online.
Thanks
Sandra
London: Bradford, Van der Velden, Peill, Harris
Norfolk: Chilvers, Sparkes
IOW: Barton, Please, Shiner
Cheshire: Parker. Bradley, Hooley
Staffordshire: Buckley, Hargreaves

Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: Broderick 1891 - could someone please clarify?
« Reply #5 on: Sunday 02 March 08 13:23 GMT (UK) »
Hi Sandra,
Thanks for the explanation :)
It is interesting that it mentions teething. His disability could have been caused by mercury poisoning. In the English-speaking world the commonest source of the mercury was teething powders, which were widely available. Mercury used to be used in the making of hats and this was known to have affected the nervous systems of hatters, causing them to tremble and appear insane, hence the phrase "As Mad as a Hatter"

Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline casalguidi

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,446
    • View Profile
Re: Broderick 1891 - could someone please clarify?
« Reply #6 on: Sunday 02 March 08 13:40 GMT (UK) »
Perhaps P'l (Principal) W'drs (Warder's) Clerk H(her/his) M(majestie's) Convict Service.

Casalguidi :)
Census information is Crown Copyright http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk