1861/1871 Census for John & Margaret.

[hinton]

Have spent ages looking for the marriage of Margaret,  I have found her marriage in 1857 to John Bulman.
John is listed as a farmer aged 28 and Margaret Ann is 23.
Margaret sometimes listed as Mary Ann because of the shortening of her name to Mgt this has been taken as Mary Ann was bn at Usworth West Auckland. Some of her siblings have used Washington West Auck on their info.
Having got the cert. thought it would be plain sailing.!!!!!!  No sign of them on the 1881 census.
Any sightings of them on the 1861 and 71 Census?
Hinton.

[karenlee]

Hey Hinton

This may be them :-

1861 Census England Durham Redworth
RG9/3684/64/8
Redworth

TODD
Mark Head Marr 64 Railway Lab Durham Redworth
Mary Wife Marr 66 Durham Redworth
William BULMAN Son Marr 32 Cabinet Maker Durham Redworth
Margaret BULMAN Dau Marr 28 Durham Stockton on Tees
John BULMAN GrSon Unmarr 3 Durham Bishop Auckland
Henry Thomas GrSon Unmarr 4mths Durham Redworth

1871 Census England Durham East Thickley
RG10/4929/100/31
Temperance Street

BULMAN
William Head Marr 42 Cabinet Maker Durham Redworth
Margaret Wife Marr 33 Durham Sherburn
John Son Unmarr 12 Scholar Durham Bishop Auckland
Henry T Son Unmarr 10 Scholar Durham Redworth
William T Son Unmarr 8 Scholar Durham Shildon
Eliza Dau Unmarr 8mths Durham Shildon
Charles E LISTER Step Son Unmarr 11 Scholar Durham Ryhope
Catherine A LISTER Step Dau Unmarr 9 Scholar Durham Ryhope

Cheers
Karenlee

[hinton]

Hello Karenlee,
Sorry if my request seems a little confusing.
Margaret married John Bulman in 1857 when he was listed as being 28 and she was 23.
This would make them approx 32 and 27 in 1861 and 10yrs older than that in 1871.
He was a farmer in West Auckland.
Hope this makes it clearer.
Thanks,
Hinton.,

[trish251]

Hi Hinton

Margaret Todd married William Bulman at about the same time that your couple married. I thought initially this may be John masquerading as William - but no. I cannot find your folks - nor any children born Auckland that seem unaccounted for in 1861. Is there any likelihood that they immigrated?

Trish

[karenlee]

My thought too Trish.  That's why I posted .... just in case.

Karenlee

[roma]

Information removed due to copyright violation. See http://www.rootschat.com/forum/copyright.php for more details

RootsChat must deal with any breach of copyright by its members.

For some time the team of Copyright Editors has been removing breaches of copyright and sending detailed personal messages to the member that had posted the information.  Due to the volume of posts and members this is now impractical.  Messages in breach will simply be deleted and this notice posted.  We apologise for any inconvenience caused but are sure you will appreciate the importance of this issue.

[karenlee]

Oohhh, clever boy..... well done Robert. 

Karenlee

[trish251]

Just found that too - well done Robert & I did seea Mary Ann born Auckland on FreeBDM - obviously didn't check too well 

Trish

[trish251]

I think they may be hiding as Robson in 1871 - I am having great trouble reading it
anyone else like to try
RG10/4935 14/ 22

Trish