Hi Dave/BY
Tebay's 'List of Pilots 1734-1990' is of course an invaluable resource for anyone with Liverpool Pilots in their family tree, but I wonder just how thorough was his research and to what degree his findings were independently checked prior to publication?
The reason I ask is that, apart from discovering two definite errors concerning the demise of two of my EVANS relatives, I've also noticed a couple of other apparent anomolies viz :-
(i) According to
http://www.old-liverpool.co.uk/Pilots.html a Hugh PEERS (who married Martha LESTER in 1787) was 1st master of No 6 FRIENDS GOODWILL in February 1808, with a Hugh PEERS junior and a Thomas LESTER included in the list of pilots.
But Tebay has only one H PEERS, licensed in 1786, died 1813 (the same year as No 6 pilot Thomas LESTER).
I can't help wondering whether Tebay's PEERS W, licensed 1814, retired 1827, is in fact Hugh's son Hugh (b1787 Liverpool) by his first wife Martha LESTER?
(The PEERS SR in Tebay's list, licensed 1827, retired 1854, is Hugh senior's son Stanley Roberts PEERS by his second wife Elizabeth ROBERTS).
(ii) The above Martha LESTER's sister Mary (b1762 Landican) married John CHATTERTON in 1781.
Tebay has a pilot CHATTERTON T, licensed 1817, retired 1846, died 1853.
When a Thomas CHATTERTON married Christiana CHATTERTON on 13 October 1829 in Christ Church, Hunter Street, his occupation was given as pilot.
When a Thomas CHATTERTON married Elizabeth Grace HEWITT on 18 September 1833 in Liverpool St Anne Richmond his occupation was also given as pilot.
The 1841 Census has a 38 year-old master pilot Thomas CHATTERTON (born c1803) living in Wesley Street, Toxteth Park, with 33 year-old wife Christieny. By 1851 Christieny is a 43 year-old widow living in New Ferry, indicating that master-pilot Thomas (born c1803) died some time between 1841 & 1851?
The 1851 Census has a 57 year-old Thomas CHATTERTON (born c1794) living in Chadwick Place, Liverpool, with wife Elizabeth Grace, occupation superannuated pilot.
So ostensibly two pilots named Thomas CHATTERTON, but only one in Tebay's list?
I would stress that this isn't to detract from the value of Tebay in any way - it's merely a comment concerning the perceived accuracy/reliability thereof.