Michael
You asked "There have been few occasions were the Bishop's Transcripts have not accurately represented what was in the original register."
I believe I am reading the original register, LDS Film, not BT's, although when I came to a single baptism entry for an illegitimate child in 1765 there was a note dated 1773 which read ..............
The above is only a transcription of the register for the original see the old book of Parchment which is brought down to October 7th 1781.
I had considered the theory of an ill child being baptised at home but all entries in the time frame I have looked at read the same. The family I am looking at had ten children baptised between 1742 and 1759 and the entries all read "baptised Shankhouse".
Perhaps it was just the way the scribe of the day liked to record things, if you could advise of another theory I would be grateful.
Have to mention GenUKI is my guiding light, particularly in terms of finding discovering where what are to me are obscure place names.
Maggiemae
Christine your reply popped in as I was typing .....
I don't know if the were any little chapels anywhere near Cramlington but that was what I had in mind when I read the entries. Do hope someone can suggest a way of finding out.
MM