Hi again
I see there are a good number ( 30 + ) of "family trees" for John GLOVER / Rebecca COX, published on the ancestry.com website.
I don't wish to be disparaging of people's efforts, but for the most part, it seems that much of the information contained in these trees is repetitious - and where there "is guesswork" rather than "facts", the "information" multiplies to create an impression that "it must be true".
But enough of that.
Let's start with the "mysterious Amy" born circa 1850. Having looked at the actual 1851 census form, it seemed clear to me that the enumerator had made an alteration to the name of the infant daughter of Rebecca and John. Sure it could be construed as "A m y" ... but it could also be
"A n n y" or "A m m y". Couldn't find a birth for an Amy GLOVER, nor a death record in UK or NZ.
What I did find though was a record of what appears to be their firstborn, a daughter named "Emma" who was baptised on 1 September 1850, at the parish church in Wilmslow, Cheshire (- and isn't that where the couple were married ? ).
My take is that "Anny" or "Ammy" is in fact Emma ( - maybe she was known as "Emmy" ??).
Edited to add ... familysearch has this daughter listed (1851) as "A m o s ". Will try and attach link to baptism record. Link Added Edit: Link no longer working - removed by me.[Sometimes these links "time out" - if that happens you'll need to access it through the familysearch website. ]
Added: Sorry I've had to remove the links (they do 'time-out' ). You may already have access to familysearch but if not, then it is a simple process to sign up with them for a free account. familysearch.org :
~ Lu
continues next post ->