Marriage details look up please - Murby 1830

[Framesmiths1816]

Hi,

If anyone is going near Wigston Records Office or knows of another source and feels very generous, could I get the details of the following wedding please.

Samuel Murby to Mary Warner 11/6/1830 All Saints Loughborough.

What I am looking for are parents names, witnesses, bonds or Banns, occupations, abodes, spinster, bachellor, Widdow etc

I am trying to work out why this marriage happened in Loughborough when both parties were within St Mary De Castro Leicester. The only thing I can think of is that Mary was living with another family or family member in Loughborough and not with her father in Leicester. Mary was born in 1809 (Shepshed) and Samuel possibly around 1807 (place unknown).

Many thanks - Mark

[Mike from Leicester]

Greeting’s Again. …Mark.

I’ll see what I can find out for you this coming week at the Records Office..

In the meantime I can confirm that the Marriage was conducted by Licence.
So hopefully there will be Extra information held on the Indexed Licence Bonds.

Occupation. Parish of residence on the day of the marriage. Ages
And who put up the Bonds.

The Parish Marriage Register for 1830 will not have Parents names
unfortunately we don’t get these for another seven years.

I will post my findings on this thread.

MIKE…….   .   

[Framesmiths1816]

Hi again Mike,

Much appreciated, thank you.

Best regards - Mark

[Mike from Leicester]

Greeting’s Again….Mark……

As promised Murby Marriage details :~

All Saints  Parish Church. Loughborough.

MARRIAGES ANNO DOMINI :~ 1830. 

Page. 133.
Entry No’. 399
.

Samuel Murby. Of the Parish of St: Mary’s of Leicester . Bachelor.
Mary Warner. Of this Parish. Spinster.

Married in this Church
This Eleventh Day of June.
One Thousand Eight Hundred and Thirty.
By Licence   By Me :~ John Boyles. Curate.

Both signed the Register by their own signatures

In the Presence of :~

Benjamin Willson..
Mary Potter.

EXTRA INFORMATION ...... via the Licence Bonds

Approved & Granted 10th. June. 1830.

MURBY. Samuel. Hairdresser. St: Mary’s Leicester. Widower
No Aged given

WARNER. Mary. Spinster. Of Loughborough 
aged 21 / 24 / 27 it was not that clear

Marriage to take Place All Saints Parish Church. Loughborough.

NO Securer of Bonds was mentioned.
Therefore they just wanted to marry quickly 

MIKE……

[Mike from Leicester]

Greeting’s Again…..Mark

Murby / Warner  Burial details of note…….

St: Mary’s Parish. Leicester.:~

1833.

Burial Register No’. 1116.

Sarah Warner..
Abode….King Street.
14th. March.
Aged. 43.

John Forster. Curate. 

1848.
Reg. No’, 219.

Mary Murby.
Abode. …Welford Road.
27th. April.
Aged. 38.

Signed…….The Vicar.

1849.

Burial Reg. No'. 435.
Samuel Murby.
Abode…..Welford Road.
14th. March.
Aged…..42.

George Bishop. Officiating Minister.

MIKE…….

[Framesmiths1816]

Hi Mike,

Thank you for all this information. You may be wondering how I can tie these two people together as Mother and Daughter.

From the Leicester Mercury and Cronicle 1830

"On Friday last, at Loughbrough, Mr Samuel Murby, Hair Dresser, of this town to Mary, eldest daughter of Mr Isaac Warner, of King-Street in this place."

Mary would have been 21 and her mother was possibly unusually young, Mary being the second child. In this instance I am lucky that,being Baptists, some of the childrens births/baptisms have been registered twice. The early ones are in Shepshed. These are then duplicated and later ones included in Tiverton Devon which also included the mother's full name. It was a practice for Baptists to records the birth dates of new congragational members. Isaac and family were part of John Heathcote's 1816 exodus from Loughborough to Tiverton. Isaac worked for Heathcote for about 10 years and also took his family to Paris to work for Heathcote there as well. He returned to Leicester in about 1827 and set up in King St as a small Lace Manufacturer. I think some of the children must be with other family or working in Loughborough hence Mary's marriage in Loughborough.

I wonder if your Benjamin Wilson/Mary Potter witnesses might hold a clue.

Thanks again

Mark