Author Topic: Submitted IGI how reliable..?  (Read 2575 times)

Offline selwynfroggitt

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 278
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Submitted IGI how reliable..?
« on: Monday 07 February 11 17:49 GMT (UK) »
Apart from those from Combe Street Independent all my IGI extracts for Lyme Regis  are submitted... and try as I may I can not get the baptisms relationships to agree with the census relationships...
The baptisms have dates and parents so I have accepted that they are from original sources.. where else could they come from

Offline aghadowey

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 52,528
    • View Profile
Re: Submitted IGI how reliable..?
« Reply #1 on: Monday 07 February 11 18:17 GMT (UK) »
Family Bible perhaps?
Away sorting out DNA matches... I may be gone for some time many years!

Offline nanny jan

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,154
  • Russian John
    • View Profile
Re: Submitted IGI how reliable..?
« Reply #2 on: Monday 07 February 11 18:22 GMT (UK) »
Hi,

If you want to double check, the Dorset FHS have transcribed Lyme Regis Parish Registers and offer a look-up service.

Nanny Jan
Howard , Viney , Kingsman, Pain/e, Rainer/ Rayner, Barham, George, Wakeling (Catherine), Vicary (Frederick)   all LDN area/suburbs  Ottley/ MDX,
Henman/ KNT   Gandy/LDN before 1830  Burgess/LDN
Barham/SFK   Rainer/CAN (Toronto) Gillians/CAN  Sturgeon/CAN (Vancouver)
Bailey/LDN Page/KNT   Paling/WA (var)



All census look-ups are crown copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Redroger

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,680
  • Dad and Fireman at Kings Cross 13.7.1951
    • View Profile
Re: Submitted IGI how reliable..?
« Reply #3 on: Monday 07 February 11 18:33 GMT (UK) »
My experience with submissions leads to the short answer: Not very!
Ayres Brignell Cornwell Harvey Shipp  Stimpson Stubbings (all Cambs) Baumber Baxter Burton Ethards Proctor Stanton (all Lincs) Luffman (all counties)


Offline I've left

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 147
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Submitted IGI how reliable..?
« Reply #4 on: Monday 07 February 11 20:04 GMT (UK) »
Try looking at what other records are contained within the batch. If there are lots then this suggests someone has made an effort to add to the IGI parish records not previously covered.

Bryan

Offline selwynfroggitt

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 278
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Submitted IGI how reliable..?
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday 08 February 11 10:48 GMT (UK) »
Thank you for your replies..I have a Samuel Wood born 1803 and a Samuel Wood born 1804..one was a sailor and the other a carpenter... The sailor and his sister Margaret both died in Guernsey and the Guernsey death certs name the parents of the deceased which in both these deaths were Samuel Wood and Mary Cox.
The IGI submissions show Samuel Wood and Mary Cox had other children including Susan  Wood and Sarah Wood both baptised on the same day in 1797...
However the 1841 and 1851 census shows that Susan Wood is unmarried and living with her brother Samuel Wood a carpenter..
It would seem that the IGI and the death certs don't agree...
A possible explanation is that there was another Susan Wood born around the same time who is the sister of the carpenter and her birth and baptism have not been recorded.

Complicated

Offline Ermintrude46

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 723
  • Capture of the Maria Riggersbergen, Oct 18th 1806
    • View Profile
Re: Submitted IGI how reliable..?
« Reply #6 on: Thursday 10 February 11 21:10 GMT (UK) »
Could Samuel have been a ship's carpenter?  My Jones were shipwrights/ship's carpenters and the Extraordinary accounts for the Deptford shipyard held at Kew often list several of the ship's carpenters as at sea in the monthly accounts.
Ermy
Baldwin / Dixey / Rumble (Berkshire)
Burnsides / Corps / Harker / HINDLE / Longstaff / Martin / Page (Co. Durham)
Chalker / Glyde / Morris / Pitman / Stroud (Dorset)
BARTON / Heasman / Wheatley (East Sussex)
Baby / Silver / Silvester (Hampshire)
BARTON / Cheeseman / Head / JONES / Kidder / Wood (Kent)
Chalker (Somerset)
Chatburn / HINDLE (West Yorkshire)
Curtis / Davis / Stevens (Wiltshire)
Arcules / Carter / HINTON (Worcestershire)

~.~. main lines in CAPS .~.~

Offline suelaw1954

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 175
  • Sue, Feb 1955. So cute, what went wrong?
    • View Profile
Re: Submitted IGI how reliable..?
« Reply #7 on: Wednesday 18 May 11 01:52 BST (UK) »
As previous people have said the quality is variable. I've found some very useful (worthwhile chasing a copy of the PR) while others are rubbish.
The tests I apply are:
Is the name reasonably accurate? (e.g. submissions using a woman's married name are from things like censuses)
Is the date complete? ("Abt year" implies derivation from census or death)
Is the parish fully entered with reasonable spelling & correct county?

These seem to indicate transcription from a reasonable source (parish register or good transcription)

Sue
Common(s) - Sussex, London, Northumberland
Spall - London, Suffolk (Debenham, Cretingham)
Goddard - Sussex (Brighton, Newtimber, Edburton)
Piller - London, Norfolk
Shadbolt - Herts (Codicote, Datchworth)
Young - Sussex (Brighton)
Rose - Army, London
Beckwith - London, Norfolk

Offline Redroger

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,680
  • Dad and Fireman at Kings Cross 13.7.1951
    • View Profile
Re: Submitted IGI how reliable..?
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday 18 May 11 15:43 BST (UK) »
Seem reasonable criteria Sue, I would add in attempt to contact the submitter, some of these I have found helpful, others to be charitable not quite so helpful.
Ayres Brignell Cornwell Harvey Shipp  Stimpson Stubbings (all Cambs) Baumber Baxter Burton Ethards Proctor Stanton (all Lincs) Luffman (all counties)