When John William Burns married Grace Wilberforce in Toxteth Park, Liverpool in 1897 he named his father as John William Burns (deceased) calico printer. John’s age at marriage is indistinct (ink has faded) and is either 30 or 39 giving him a birth year of 1858 or 1867. Witness to the marriage was Margaret Burns and the groom gave his place of residence as 1 Chester Street – Margaret’s house.
So I traced back Margaret and discovered that Margaret McPherson married a John Burns at Christmas 1853 in Paisley High Church. John was a police officer, but went on to be a master mariner and they had 5 children, including John Burns jnr born 7 May 1857 in Paisley. So, I put two and two together and decided that John senior and Margaret were my 2 x great grand parents and moved on with the rest of my tree.
But niggles about a calico printer never went away. I sent away for John & Margaret’s youngest daughter’s 1872 birth certificate and this showed John’s occupation as Master Mariner – so why would his son in 1897 claim that his father was a calico printer?
Back to the beginning and oops, I think I jumped to the wrong conclusion.
1851 Scotland census – living at 6 Rowan Street, Paisley Abbey
Mary Burns, 53, domestic purposes, born Ireland
James Burns, 23, calico printer, born Ireland
Cathrine Burns, 25, seamstress, born Ireland
Mary Burns, 18, bleacher, born Ireland
John Burns, 20, (born 1831), son, calico printer
Ann Burns, 5, granddaughter, born Dumbarton
Cathrine Burns, 9 mths, granddaughter, born Dumbarton
…… also at the same address ……
Rosana Burns, 21, domestic purposes, born Ireland
Miles Burns, 19, brother, calico printer, born Ireland
Michael Burns, 17, brother, calico printer, born Ireland
John Burns, 15, (born 1836) brother, calico printer, born Ireland
So I have two John Burns, both calico printers in 1851 living at the same address (possibly cousins). The 1861 census has John Burns, policeman living at Inverkip, married to Margaret as being born in 1835, so this would be the younger of the cousins.
What happened to the older John Burns born 1831? Can any one help?
Than you
Wilbs