Hi Shanko - I think I read somewhere that there was no organised feeding of the men, they pretty much fended for themselves if they wanted decent food..I can't for the life of me remember where I read that
However I did find this...
Humanistic reforms of the British Army and Royal Navy.
Up until the late 1800’s, it was still commonplace to house soldiers in public houses and taverns rather than purpose-built barracks. When barracks were built, no washing facilities were provided. Toilets were in the form of a bucket at the end of each room. This bucket would be emptied out at the start of the morning and used to carry rations back to the barrack rooms.
Food was poor. Meat was often of poor quality, if not rotten. Vegetables were rarely provided, as was fruit. Bread, cheese and stale water were the most common items on daily menus.
From the late 1850’s army reforms grew apace. The Crimean war and Indian mutinies had forced the Army to rethink some of its policies regarding its troops. Sickness and disease had caused the army to alter its medical services completely.
The quality of leadership in the British Army came under increased scrutiny. Commission by purchase ended in 1871 and more men were commissioned from the ranks. Proper messes were established to allow for better food to be provided to soldiers and officers alike.
Naval reforms started after the mutinies of the Napoleonic wars. Such mutinies developed due to poor pay (which had not changed since Cromwellian times), appalling food (which led to long-term bouts of scurvy and beriberi on many occasions) and overly severe discipline. Most demands were met due to the very restrained behaviour of the mutineers and the general legitimacy of their demands.
- and this makes interesting reading
www.crimeantexts.org.ukSuey