Author Topic: Complted - BELLAMY-SINGLETON - Sydney or Parramatta  (Read 691 times)

Offline Neilhilt

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 69
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Complted - BELLAMY-SINGLETON - Sydney or Parramatta
« on: Tuesday 13 September 11 22:25 BST (UK) »
James Bellamy and Hannah Singleton married on 15th June 1818.  It probably occured at St Johns V844-147B CB, but a registration also appears for St Phillips V21983A CA.
Can someone advise why there might be two registrations and which place is the one where the event occured.  I get nauseous winding through the micrfilm.

Thank you JM. :)
Smith - Ayrshire, Pyrmont, Newtown.  Dunsmore - Ayrshire.  Fyfe - Lanarkshire.  Patterson - Hunter Valley, Goulburn.  Rex - Yorkshire, Hobart.  Colbran - Sussex, Hawkesbury.  Lovell - Somerset, Marsfield.  Gallard - Kent,  Marsfield.  Sherriff - Angushire.  Cussen.  Dean - Mudgee.  Hill - Somerset, Gulgong

Offline Neilhilt

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 69
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Bellamy-Singleton - Sydney or Parramatta
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday 13 September 11 22:27 BST (UK) »
Correction Parramatta rego should be V844-147B.
Smith - Ayrshire, Pyrmont, Newtown.  Dunsmore - Ayrshire.  Fyfe - Lanarkshire.  Patterson - Hunter Valley, Goulburn.  Rex - Yorkshire, Hobart.  Colbran - Sussex, Hawkesbury.  Lovell - Somerset, Marsfield.  Gallard - Kent,  Marsfield.  Sherriff - Angushire.  Cussen.  Dean - Mudgee.  Hill - Somerset, Gulgong

Offline majm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,385
  • NSW 1806 Bowman Flag Ecce signum.
    • View Profile
Re: Bellamy-Singleton - Sydney or Parramatta
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday 14 September 11 01:20 BST (UK) »
Hi there,

During Gov Macquarie's administration, he instituted some general orders (see the Syd Gazette digitised at Trove, circa Sept 1810) that required clergy conducting bdm ceremonies to transmit a record of each of those services to the NSW Chaplain (At St Phillips ie at CA).   Thus a marriage conducted at CB should have been notified to the Chaplain at CA. 

Over 100 years later, the NSW BDM produced their index of the ECRs.  Thus, both the CB marriage and the transmitted record at CA are indexed, and both are filmed.   Some of the ECRs are indexed more than twice.   Some of the IGI extracted records overlooked transcribing records not found at CA.   Yes, I agree it can be nauseous going through the microfilm. 

If you would like "chapter and verse" expanding this further, please let me know.

Cheers,  JM  EDIT TO ADD, the marriage ceremony was most likely conducted at CB.
The information in my posts is provided for academic and non-commercial research purposes. 
Random Acts of Kindness Given Freely are never Worthless for they are Priceless.
Qui scit et non docet.    Qui docet et non vivit.    Qui nescit et non interrogat.   
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
I do not have a face book or a twitter account.