Author Topic: James Pritchard marriage 1891  (Read 3180 times)

Offline sandra c

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 393
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
James Pritchard marriage 1891
« on: Sunday 18 December 11 12:01 GMT (UK) »
Hi can some kind person check the parish record for Henley for the marriage of James Pritchard born 1869 at Potscomb son of John Pritchard and Susan Brown
 
     I have found ref to marriage for a  James Pritchard  in 1891 to a Charlotte Annie Foster in Henley on the free bmd website but i do not have the parish records for Henley

   Thank you Sandy

Offline nanny jan

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,154
  • Russian John
    • View Profile
Re: James Pritchard marriage 1891
« Reply #1 on: Sunday 18 December 11 12:38 GMT (UK) »
Hi,

The Henley registration district covers several places and spans the boundaries of three counties;  are you certain that they married in a church and in Henley?  If it was a Register Office wedding then you will need to buy the certificate as these are not available on line.


Nanny Jan
Howard , Viney , Kingsman, Pain/e, Rainer/ Rayner, Barham, George, Wakeling (Catherine), Vicary (Frederick)   all LDN area/suburbs  Ottley/ MDX,
Henman/ KNT   Gandy/LDN before 1830  Burgess/LDN
Barham/SFK   Rainer/CAN (Toronto) Gillians/CAN  Sturgeon/CAN (Vancouver)
Bailey/LDN Page/KNT   Paling/WA (var)



All census look-ups are crown copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline TomRees

  • -
  • RootsChat Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 630
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: James Pritchard marriage 1891
« Reply #2 on: Sunday 18 December 11 12:47 GMT (UK) »
Quote
I have found ref to marriage for a  James Pritchard  in 1891 to a Charlotte Annie Foster in Henley on the free bmd website but i do not have the parish records for Henley

what exactly do you want to know?  Parents of the Bride, her age?

Offline sandra c

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 393
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: James Pritchard marriage 1891
« Reply #3 on: Sunday 18 December 11 14:30 GMT (UK) »
Hi Thank you both set of parents to know i got the right marriage thank you Sandy


Offline TomRees

  • -
  • RootsChat Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 630
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: James Pritchard marriage 1891
« Reply #4 on: Sunday 18 December 11 15:07 GMT (UK) »
Looking at the 1901 census, Charlotte was born c1874, Sonning Eye.

James as you say was born Postcombe, Oxon.

If you check the 1881 census, you should see if a Charlotte A Foster is born Sonning ..... and also hopefully see her with her Family.

Offline PaulC120

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: James Pritchard marriage 1891
« Reply #5 on: Sunday 18 December 11 15:11 GMT (UK) »
Ex OFHS transcripts for St. Peter & St. Paul Checkendon
1891 19 Dec PRITCHARD James 22, b., lab, s. John, Lab.
FOSTER Charlote Ann 19, sp., Hurst, d. Henry, lab.
Wits: Thomas x BROOKER, Ellen PRITCHARD
Carter - Berkshire, Oxfordshire, Leicester, Surrey
Povey - Berkshire, Sussex, Glamorgan, U.S.A.
Havell - Berkshire, Oxfordshire, Canada, Argentina
Hunt – Berkshire
Franklin – Berkshire
Mowlson – Berkshire
Chandler - Berkshire, Somerset
Wallin – Berkshire
Johnson – Berkshire
Druce - Berkshire, Oxfordshire, Buckinghamshire
Gandy - Hampshire, Glamorgan
Phillips - Hampshire
Rowe - Buckinghamshire
Cook - Hampshire,
Cruse - Hampshire
Eyles - Hampshire
Leppard - Oxfordshire, Glamorgan

Offline TomRees

  • -
  • RootsChat Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 630
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: James Pritchard marriage 1891
« Reply #6 on: Sunday 18 December 11 15:21 GMT (UK) »
well, cant see her in 1881 - 1891 she's in Service in Reading.

A family called Brooker caught my eye in 1881, a daughter Charlotte A - and I see that said Thomas G Brooker is a marriage witness.

RG11/1490 Folio 38 Pag: 1 Checkenden, Henley District.

Wait one.


Yes - looks like Charlottes mother, Mary Jane was previously Foster - heres the marriage to T G Brooker

Marriages Dec 1878   
~~~~~~~~
 
Brooker  Thomas Greenaway    Henley  3a 1037   
FOSTER  Mary Jane     Henley  3a 1037   
Prior  Hannah     Henley  3a 1037   
Syrad  Alfred     Henley  3a 1037   
Winchcombe  William     Henley  3a 1037   


So Mary Jane's Maiden name was:-

Marriages Dec 1872   
~~~~~~~~
 
Foster  Henry    Cookham  2c 891   
LACEY  Mary Jane     Cookham  2c 891   
LUCEY  Mary Jane     Cookham  2c 891   


Verifiable via:-

Births Sep 1873   
~~~~~~~~
 
Foster  Charlotte Ann     Henley  3a 578


Offline PaulC120

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: James Pritchard marriage 1891
« Reply #7 on: Sunday 18 December 11 15:36 GMT (UK) »
And by some remarkable conicidence  :) Also at Checkendon

Ex OFHS transcripts for St. Peter & St. Paul Checkendon
1878 9 Nov BROOKER Thomas Greenway x 23, b., lab.
FOSTER Mary Jane 22, sp., wid., d. William WISE, lab.
Wits: Absalom BENWELL, Roseanna BENWELL
Carter - Berkshire, Oxfordshire, Leicester, Surrey
Povey - Berkshire, Sussex, Glamorgan, U.S.A.
Havell - Berkshire, Oxfordshire, Canada, Argentina
Hunt – Berkshire
Franklin – Berkshire
Mowlson – Berkshire
Chandler - Berkshire, Somerset
Wallin – Berkshire
Johnson – Berkshire
Druce - Berkshire, Oxfordshire, Buckinghamshire
Gandy - Hampshire, Glamorgan
Phillips - Hampshire
Rowe - Buckinghamshire
Cook - Hampshire,
Cruse - Hampshire
Eyles - Hampshire
Leppard - Oxfordshire, Glamorgan

Offline TomRees

  • -
  • RootsChat Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 630
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: James Pritchard marriage 1891
« Reply #8 on: Sunday 18 December 11 15:43 GMT (UK) »
do keep up !   :P