Author Topic: Trouble Deciphering Visitation  (Read 1873 times)

Offline david64

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 750
  • Snow in Llansilin, 7 Jan 2010
    • View Profile
Trouble Deciphering Visitation
« on: Tuesday 13 March 12 01:11 GMT (UK) »
Evening,

Seeking some help with the abbreviations with the below visitation for Whittingham:

http://www.archive.org/stream/recordsociety58recouoft#page/254/mode/2up

In particular where it says Agnes vx. Hughe Carington & had yssue Agnes vx. Hugh Dod ...

Does this mean that his wife was the widow of Hugh Carington & by her first husband had a child Agnes who married Hugh Dod?

Thanks in advance.

Offline GrahamSimons

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,072
    • View Profile
Re: Trouble Deciphering Visitation
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday 13 March 12 08:56 GMT (UK) »
I think vx is ux - alternative at the time; and ux ia abbreviation for Latin uxor - wife [of].
Simons Barrett Jaffray Waugh Langdale Heugh Meade Garnsey Evans Vazie Mountcure Glascodine Parish Peard Smart Dobbie Sinclair....
in Stirlingshire, Roxburghshire; Bucks; Devon; Somerset; Northumberland; Carmarthenshire; Glamorgan

Offline HannahB

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Trouble Deciphering Visitation
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday 13 March 12 09:58 GMT (UK) »
Other than GrahamSimons note about ux (uxor) I think you have the interpretation right - she was a widow with a daughter and this was a remarriage. Hannah
New York/Ontario: Buchan, Cronmiller/Kronmuller
Sussex: Harman   
Chesham, Bucks: Plested, Dell, Dwight, Sedgewick, Cordery, Rance.
Alabama: Howton, Anderson, Palmer, Massey, Gwin 
Gt. Gaddesden, Herts; Cook
London/ Bristol; Bellamy, Child
Scotland; McLeod, Shannon
British Columbia: McLeod, Simpson

Offline johnxyz

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 447
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Trouble Deciphering Visitation
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday 13 March 12 10:14 GMT (UK) »
The wording is less than clear. In the first instance I would read it as "Robart married Agnes the wife (widow) of Hugh Carington and had issue Agnes the wife of Hugh Dod."

I am afraid I disagree with previous reply, as I think that sentence can be read "Robart married Agnes"  and then "Robart had issue ....".

However, I would want to check both the original MS (they are held at the British Library, St Pancras) and also look at the 1580 visitation referred to.

Is there any other collateral evidence?


Offline david64

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 750
  • Snow in Llansilin, 7 Jan 2010
    • View Profile
Re: Trouble Deciphering Visitation
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday 13 March 12 12:22 GMT (UK) »
Thanks.

I've not looked for other evidence yet.