Author Topic: Richard III and DNA testing  (Read 29278 times)

Offline Alexander.

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,297
    • View Profile
Re: Richard III and DNA testing
« Reply #18 on: Thursday 13 September 12 20:23 BST (UK) »
Just a quick overview for you:

There are basically three types of DNA tests useful for genealogical purposes:
  • Y-DNA - DNA from the Y chromosome (found in cell nucleus) which only males have, and is passed from father to son with very few changes. Useful for direct paternal lines.
  • mtDNA - Mitochondial DNA found in mitochondria, passed from mother to all children (male and female) through the generations. Useful for direct maternal lines.
  • Autosomal DNA - Autosomes are your chromosomes in your cell nuclei that are not sex chromosomes (that is, not X or Y). When reproduction occurs, mitosis and meiosis take place which mix up (recombine) the DNA of the parents, to make a unique offspring. For this reason, unlike Y-DNA or mtDNA, it is not traceable along one single line. This means that it is only useful for determining rough relationships between people (eg. Second cousins), but it will not tell you on which lines you are second cousins. Autosomal DNA is only really useful for showing relationships in the last five or so generations, and general information about your ethnic ancestry.

You can look in the RootsChat Lexicon under DNA Testing for more threads on the subject:
http://surname.rootschat.com/lexicon/reflib-lexicon.php?letter=D&lang=EN&input_form=

Offline clearly

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 495
  • If we understand the past we understand the future
    • View Profile
Re: Richard III and DNA testing
« Reply #19 on: Friday 14 September 12 09:18 BST (UK) »
Many thanks for that Freckneale. It is exactly what I wanted: concise, clear and containing everything I wanted to know.
Forster Cul, Harrison Cul, Wood Cul Yks, Castley Cul & Wes, Lorimer Cul and Perth,Innis Cul, Casson, Cul, Johnston,Cul & Nfk, Carruthers Cul, Ewart Cul, Jardine Cul & Dmf, Story Cul, ONeill Cul & NI, Davis Cul & Ldn,

Offline Nick29

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 6,273
    • View Profile
Re: Richard III and DNA testing
« Reply #20 on: Friday 14 September 12 09:20 BST (UK) »
He wasn't a hunchback, as Shakespeare alleged, but he did have scoliosis, which is a sideways curvature of the spine.  Apparently the skeleton also has scoliosis.


Apparently the skeleton also had an arrowhead lodged in the back (as Lydart said)  :o
RIP 1949-10th January 2013

Best Wishes,  Nick.

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Jean McGurn

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,065
    • View Profile
Re: Richard III and DNA testing
« Reply #21 on: Friday 14 September 12 15:30 BST (UK) »
Perhaps they ought to get the team in from History Cold Case  ;D they did a good job on the skelton that had been buried in a Scottish castle - think it was Stirling Castle but not sure without watching the programme again.

Jean
McGurn, Stables, Harris, Owens, Bellis, Stackhouse, Darwent, Co(o)mbe


Offline johnxyz

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 447
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Richard III and DNA testing
« Reply #22 on: Friday 14 September 12 15:41 BST (UK) »
The article I saw said Ibsen was the end of a direct female line - can't remember if his mother had no daughters or whether there were no sisters with children. Also said that for old samples mtDNA is easier to recover and analyse than Y-DNA.

Offline davidft

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,209
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Richard III and DNA testing
« Reply #23 on: Friday 14 September 12 15:53 BST (UK) »
Perhaps they ought to get the team in from History Cold Case  ;D they did a good job on the skelton that had been buried in a Scottish castle - think it was Stirling Castle but not sure without watching the programme again.

Jean

The dig at Leicester is being filmed for a TV "special" which a cynic may say has shades of we know the result we want now how do we get there about it  ::)

What surprised me is that reading articles on the dig there was allegedly a stone pillar on the site until at least Victorian times saying it was the burial place of Richard III. If so one wonders why it was destroyed ......
James Stott c1775-1850. James was born in Yorkshire but where? He was a stonemason and married Elizabeth Archer (nee Nicholson) in 1794 at Ripon. They lived thereafter in Masham. If anyone has any suggestions or leads as to his birthplace I would be interested to know. I have searched for it for years without success. Thank you.

Offline davidft

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,209
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Richard III and DNA testing
« Reply #24 on: Friday 14 September 12 15:55 BST (UK) »
The article I saw said Ibsen was the end of a direct female line - can't remember if his mother had no daughters or whether there were no sisters with children. Also said that for old samples mtDNA is easier to recover and analyse than Y-DNA.

Seeing Mr Ibsen being interviewed yesterday he did talk very much as if his mother was still alive. That being the case one wonders why they didn't test her as he said she was quite excited about the Richard III connection

(Unfortunately the news report is not on the ITVplayer)
James Stott c1775-1850. James was born in Yorkshire but where? He was a stonemason and married Elizabeth Archer (nee Nicholson) in 1794 at Ripon. They lived thereafter in Masham. If anyone has any suggestions or leads as to his birthplace I would be interested to know. I have searched for it for years without success. Thank you.

Offline Redroger

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,680
  • Dad and Fireman at Kings Cross 13.7.1951
    • View Profile
Re: Richard III and DNA testing
« Reply #25 on: Friday 14 September 12 19:53 BST (UK) »
Autosomal DNA Would seem to be inherited thus, You are 50% of each of your parents, 25% of your grandparents, 12.5% great grandparents, 6.25% of your 2Xgreat grandparents, and 3.125% of your 3Xgreat grandparents. Obviously therefore unless you have a high level of inbreeding in your tree then this seems to be little use in determining your ancestral line beyond your great grandparents.
Ayres Brignell Cornwell Harvey Shipp  Stimpson Stubbings (all Cambs) Baumber Baxter Burton Ethards Proctor Stanton (all Lincs) Luffman (all counties)

Offline johnxyz

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 447
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Richard III and DNA testing
« Reply #26 on: Friday 14 September 12 20:15 BST (UK) »
Found the article re Ibsen. His mother died  4 years ago, his only sister had no children. So he is the end of the line.

A further though on mtDNA versus Y-DNA. If a Y test didn't match, there would be a question about paternity down the male line as a possible reason for a mismatch. An mtDNA mismatch would prove it's the wrong person.

And finally don't forget DNA profiling originated at Lecester University with Alec Jeffreys in the 1980s, so presumably they have some good expertise on hand.