Hi I have a conundrum in that I have Charles Holland b.c.1838 living with his parents Henry and Jane (née Coventon) in Kneesworth, Cambs in the 1841 census(Class: HO107; Piece: 63; Book: 7; Enumeration District: 11; Page: 1;).
I thought that he was the Charles Holland who, according to familysearch married Mary Ann Langham at Melbourn, Cambs on 20 March 1858 and went on to have several children.
However, when searching through other trees on Ancestry some researchers show that the Charles Holland who married Mary Ann Langham was a Charles Watson Holland to which they have attached all the same children.
According to familysearch there is a baptism of a Charles Holland, the illegitimate son of Elizabeth Holland and Charles Watson, at Kneesworth/Bassingbourne on 12 Feb 1838. As far as I can see there are no further references anywhere to a Charles Watson Holland.
On some trees both Charles Holland son of Henry and Jane and Charles Watson Holland son of Elizabeth and Charles appear, both married to Mary Ann Langham and both with the same set of children!
Henry and Jane's first child was Elizabeth, born about 1816 Guilden Morden, Cambs. She could have been the mother of Charles Watson Holland, which would mean that there was a slight coverup on the 1841 census in stating that Charles Holland was the son of Henry and Jane, when in fact he would have been their grandson. (He is 9 years younger than their youngest child).
Elizabeth married Thomas Catley in Bassingbourn, Cambs on 3 May 1840.
I can't find either Elizabeth Catley or Charles Holland on the 1851 census to see if that would offer some confirmation.
Is my supposition about Charles Holland and Charles Watson Holland being one and the same person, illegitimate son of Elizabeth Holland and grandson to Henry and Jane feasible do you think and can anyone help in finding any proof.
Thanks, Pheno