Author Topic: Women & children  (Read 1585 times)

Offline Chasing-fireflies

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 750
  • Genealogy is like Chasing fireflies....
    • View Profile
Women & children
« on: Wednesday 06 March 13 09:38 GMT (UK) »
Hi,

I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts on the childbearing age of relatives they have researched?

I mean, how old was "too old" and how young was "too young" ?

Quite a few of the people I have researched appeared to be having children for about 20 years which is quite a long time and a lot of children in my opinion  ;D
Previously - Badgirl
Thomas-Llangynwyd
Morgan-Garw / Sirhowy
Richards - Bettws
Philips - Rhondda
Pinn - London

Offline karenlee

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,662
  • Drive it like ya stole it.
    • View Profile
Re: Women & children
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday 06 March 13 10:04 GMT (UK) »

Hi

Between 1907 and 1936 my Grandmother gave to birth to 13 children, all of whom survived and there were no multiple births.  This was considered fairly normal for the time.  Over the years I have come across many more children born to a couple over a shorter time frame as well.

As we all used to say... the grandies had nothing else to do.. no electricity out in the sticks where they lived. ;D ;D

Cheers
Karenlee
Census Information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline omega 1

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,493
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Women & children
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday 06 March 13 10:13 GMT (UK) »
Hello

My "Welsh " Greatgrandmother had my Gran ( only child ) at 42.I bet she wondered what had hit her :)

omega
Pembrokeshire
James,Gibby,David/Davies,Evan/s,Edward,Thomas,Griffith,Brown,Richards,Phillipps
Carmarthenshire
Thomas,Wilkin,James
Glamorganshire
James
Husbands side
Sussex,Mitchell,White,Hew/Hugh,Peter/s,Lower,Goring,Skinner,Cavey,Padgham,Brann,Graves,Hards,Easton,Moon,Gibb/s,Shepherd
Kent,Curties,Harris/Cleverly
Buckinhamshire
Shephard,Tuck,Philips

Scotland,Riddle

Todd,could be Old Windsor or somewhere I Lincolnshire,John Todd didn't seem to know

Offline Chasing-fireflies

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 750
  • Genealogy is like Chasing fireflies....
    • View Profile
Re: Women & children
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday 06 March 13 10:49 GMT (UK) »
So it wasn't unusual for women to be still having children in their 40's then?  ;D
Previously - Badgirl
Thomas-Llangynwyd
Morgan-Garw / Sirhowy
Richards - Bettws
Philips - Rhondda
Pinn - London


Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,145
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: Women & children
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday 06 March 13 11:30 GMT (UK) »
I have several in my tree who were still having children in their 40s. However, I also have a few in their 50s with a child aged 1 or 2 after a large age gap and an older daughter in their 20s still at home. I think a bit of covering up may have gone on in some cases.
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Galium

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,098
    • View Profile
Re: Women & children
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday 06 March 13 13:45 GMT (UK) »
In the families I have traced, women typically had their last child between the ages of 40-45.  Before reliable contraception was widely available, there was no way they could avoid bearing children into their forties, other than by complete abstinence.  A woman who married at the age of 21 could easily expect to be pregnant for most of the next twenty years.
UK Census info. Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline eadaoin

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,623
  • Reilg Chill Barróg
    • View Profile
Re: Women & children
« Reply #6 on: Wednesday 06 March 13 17:15 GMT (UK) »
OH's great-grandmother was married in 1866, aged 19.
Between 1866 and 1892 she gave birth to 11 children all of whom lived to adulthood.

So she was 46 when she had the last one .. there are no gaps greater than 3 years in her family.

eadaoin
Begg - Dublin, Limerick, Cardiff
Brady - Dublin
Breslin - Wexford, Dublin
Byrne - Wicklow
O'Hara - Wexford, Kingstown
McLoghlin - Roscommon
Lawlor - Meath, Dublin
Lynam - Meath and Renovo, Pennsylvania
Everard - Meath
Fagan - Dublin
Meyler/Myler - Wicklow
Gray - Derry, Waterford
Kavanagh - Limerick

Offline Flora1966

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
    • View Profile
Re: Women & children
« Reply #7 on: Sunday 10 March 13 21:43 GMT (UK) »
My grandmother had her first child in 1934 and her 13th and last child in 1960....She was born in 1916 and was an only child....  :o

Jules..
Sussex-  MADGWICK, PONT, MITCHELL, COATES, WHEATLEY, NEWTON, COLLINS.
Kent - HALL, WARMAN, BOORN, STREDWICK, COLE, FILMER.
Suffolk - RAMUS, RUDLAND, DICKERSON, ASBEE.
Hampshire - MADGWICK, PEAKE, VARNDELL, CHAMPION, HINES, HELMS, GOSSLING.
London - PITT, RAMUS, BOOTE,
S Africa - VAN STAADEN, WATKINS, SLATER
Australia - MADGWICK, RAMUS, NEWTON.

Offline MonicaL

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 32,611
  • Girl with firewood, Morar 1910 - MEM Donaldson
    • View Profile
Re: Women & children
« Reply #8 on: Sunday 10 March 13 21:52 GMT (UK) »
20 years for childbearing is a good rule of thumb generally.....up to probably the mid 1900s I would think at least.

Monica  :)
Census information Crown Copyright, www.nationalarchives.gov.uk