Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: mark toole.  (Read 2027 times)

Offline crisane

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,489
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: mark toole.
« Reply #18 on: Saturday 25 May 13 06:59 BST (UK) »
Quote from: heywood on Friday 24 May 13 22:29 BST (UK)
Just to say that crisane's post should read 1891 - not 1901. It's the right reference just the wrong year.
They are Tully in 1901 and Thomas is a pedlar by then.

Thanks heywood. I was doing it in a hurry before taking a friend to garage sales :)

Online heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,870
    • View Profile
Re: mark toole.
« Reply #19 on: Saturday 25 May 13 07:44 BST (UK) »
Morning crisane,

It took a while for me to realise that 2 year old Mark couldn't be married in 1911 - then it dawned. As I said, I was sure I saw a possible marriage but - no not now  ::)

I will try again later.

heywood
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Pages: 1 2 [3]