Author Topic: William Whybrow Gt. Canfield 1803  (Read 1270 times)

Offline johnpeel

  • I am sorry but my email address is no longer working
  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 93
    • View Profile
William Whybrow Gt. Canfield 1803
« on: Saturday 18 June 05 17:04 BST (UK) »
Hi
 Anyone able to help with information on William Whybrow b. c.1803 Gt.Canfield 78 yr. 1881 census widower, ag. labourer.

Civill parish Blackmore.

Sub reg district Bobbingworth

Any  details of marriage  and family would be greatly appreciated to fill in details of family tree.

Regards Johnpeel.


Offline Jocie

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 476
    • View Profile
Re: William Whybrow Gt. Canfield 1803
« Reply #1 on: Saturday 18 June 05 17:10 BST (UK) »
Hi
In 1871 he was living as a lodger in Blackmore described as a widower
Hope that helps! I'll try 1861 for you
Jo
LANCASTER - London Kent Sussex Croydon
CLEMMANS - London Kent Sussex
ROCHE - London
WARE - Kent
SPENCER - Kent
NEWNHAM - Sussex
FISHER - London Norfolk
DENNINGTON - London
MONTAGUE - Kent

Any census lookups are Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Jocie

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 476
    • View Profile
Re: William Whybrow Gt. Canfield 1803
« Reply #2 on: Saturday 18 June 05 17:21 BST (UK) »
1861 he was working as Ag Lab living in Blackmore and married to Ann but no sign of any family. She was born in Aythorp Roothing Essex in 1805.
Jo
LANCASTER - London Kent Sussex Croydon
CLEMMANS - London Kent Sussex
ROCHE - London
WARE - Kent
SPENCER - Kent
NEWNHAM - Sussex
FISHER - London Norfolk
DENNINGTON - London
MONTAGUE - Kent

Any census lookups are Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline johnpeel

  • I am sorry but my email address is no longer working
  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 93
    • View Profile
Re: William Whybrow Gt. Canfield 1803
« Reply #3 on: Saturday 18 June 05 23:45 BST (UK) »
Hi Jocie

What a wonderful response to my inquiry. I must say that all my requests have been very positive.

I think that he had a son Joseph John Whybrow bn. 1837 so he might have not been included on the 1861 census. Perhaps the 1851 census might be more rewarding.

I will keep on looking as I am sure that the connection is reasonably positive. Any help on this posible connection would be appreciated.

Many thanks for your reply Johnpeel