Samuel; Whilst I happily admit I know practically nothing about this DNA game ~ and probably care even less ... One thing I thought I'd picked up was that one could / should simply ignore anything of 2% or less as just a glitch in the system.
None of those charts ye showing us, above, mean a thing to me. I don't even know where half the places are.
However, looking over that list of names? There's a good handful of names there, used by Gypsys, down the ages. Turner and Rogers, even.
But, when we consider that Smith is an extremely common, Gypsy, name; Are we then to assume a British phone directory is full of pages upon pages of Gypsys?
Not wishing to dampen ye parade. But, chasing whispers of family rumours just doesn't cut it, in Genealogy. The tried and proven way is best: Start with yeself and work back. Methodically and with an open mind. Accepting that which navigable paper trails show ye.
I'm open to discussion and debate, on this point. But, I'd suggest occupation is possibly an even greater pointer to a possible Gypsy than even name. Gun Maker just doesn't smack of a Gypsy occupation.
But, as I say, there's a whole clutch of 'Gypsy' surnames ye list there. Who knows? Ye might be barking up the wrong tree. Enjoy researching those people. One or two may actually throw a little more light
