Author Topic: Nowt like a bit o' 'onesty!  (Read 1875 times)

Offline cristeen

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 714
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Nowt like a bit o' 'onesty!
« on: Tuesday 03 July 18 20:44 BST (UK) »
While trawling through census returns looking for mistranscribed/missing ancestors I came across this family from South Emsall in Yorkshire. I had to smile at Harriet's relationship to the head of household!
Newson, Steavenson, Walker, Taylor, Dobson, Gardner, Clark, Wilson, Smith, Crossland, Goldfinch, Burnett, Hebdon, Peers, Strother, Askew, Bower, Beckwith, Patton, White, Turner, Nelson, Gilpin, Tomlinson, Thompson, Spedding, Wilkes, Carr, Butterfield, Ormandy, Wilkinson, Cocking, Glover, Pennington, Bowker, Kitching, Langhorn, Haworth, Kirkham.

Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,144
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: Nowt like a bit o' 'onesty!
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday 03 July 18 20:56 BST (UK) »
Similar thing came up on another site I belong to when the woman's relationship to the head of the house was described as Mistress. Looking at records she was as well, as she had his child 3 months later!  ;D ;D
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Greensleeves

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,495
    • View Profile
Re: Nowt like a bit o' 'onesty!
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday 03 July 18 20:59 BST (UK) »
By coincidence, we were discussing something similar on an Ancestry thread on FB.*  The principal discussion revolved round whether someone referred to in the relationship column of the census as 'Mistress' was indeed the mistress of the head of the household.  I pointed out that in my FT I have an unfortunate woman shown as 'Concubine', and someone else following the thread said she had the same thing in her tree.  What surprised us was that both these women were in Ipswich, Suffolk.  I loved the other contributor's response regarding the Ipswich enumerator:  "What a judgy-pants he must have been!"   ;D

*The same discussion as Jan (Groom) was moderating!
Suffolk: Pearl(e),  Garnham, Southgate, Blo(o)mfield,Grimwood/Grimwade,Josselyn/Gosling
Durham/Yorkshire: Sedgwick/Sidgwick, Shadforth
Ireland: Davis
Norway: Torreson/Torsen/Torrison
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: Nowt like a bit o' 'onesty!
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday 03 July 18 21:09 BST (UK) »
From the OED Concubine: A woman who cohabits with a man without being his wife; a kept mistress.

Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,144
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: Nowt like a bit o' 'onesty!
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday 03 July 18 21:13 BST (UK) »
From the OED Concubine: A woman who cohabits with a man without being his wife; a kept mistress.

Stan

Good thing we use the general term Partner today.
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline cristeen

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 714
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Nowt like a bit o' 'onesty!
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday 03 July 18 21:39 BST (UK) »
Funnily enough I did a quick search on ancestry & in 1851 one particular enumerator seemed to have a run of concubines! Interestingly some of the concubines were down as married, as were the heads of household; I suppose not necessarily to each other :)
Newson, Steavenson, Walker, Taylor, Dobson, Gardner, Clark, Wilson, Smith, Crossland, Goldfinch, Burnett, Hebdon, Peers, Strother, Askew, Bower, Beckwith, Patton, White, Turner, Nelson, Gilpin, Tomlinson, Thompson, Spedding, Wilkes, Carr, Butterfield, Ormandy, Wilkinson, Cocking, Glover, Pennington, Bowker, Kitching, Langhorn, Haworth, Kirkham.

Offline Skoosh

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,736
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Nowt like a bit o' 'onesty!
« Reply #6 on: Tuesday 03 July 18 22:36 BST (UK) »
The result of reading Deuteronomy each evening!  ;D

Skoosh.

Offline Greensleeves

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,495
    • View Profile
Re: Nowt like a bit o' 'onesty!
« Reply #7 on: Tuesday 03 July 18 22:41 BST (UK) »
In the example that Stan gives us, the woman appears to have the same surname as the man, is described as 'Wife' too.  So I do wonder how she can be described as 'Concubine' as her trade.  Unless of course the enumerator was another judgy-pants and knew more about the lady than we do.
Suffolk: Pearl(e),  Garnham, Southgate, Blo(o)mfield,Grimwood/Grimwade,Josselyn/Gosling
Durham/Yorkshire: Sedgwick/Sidgwick, Shadforth
Ireland: Davis
Norway: Torreson/Torsen/Torrison
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline coombs

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,453
  • Research the dead....forget the living.
    • View Profile
Re: Nowt like a bit o' 'onesty!
« Reply #8 on: Tuesday 03 July 18 22:47 BST (UK) »
My Huguenot ancestor was born in the mid 1720s and the register said his father's name and then said "his concubine" (In French) and her name. Several French men in the village had a concubine. It may have been more of a tradition in France.
Researching:

LONDON, Coombs, Roberts, Auber, Helsdon, Fradine, Morin, Goodacre
DORSET Coombs, Munday
NORFOLK Helsdon, Riches, Harbord, Budery
KENT Roberts, Goodacre
SUSSEX Walder, Boniface, Dinnage, Standen, Lee, Botten, Wickham, Jupp
SUFFOLK Titshall, Frost, Fairweather, Mayhew, Archer, Eade, Scarfe
DURHAM Stewart, Musgrave, Wilson, Forster
SCOTLAND Stewart in Selkirk
USA Musgrave, Saix
ESSEX Cornwell, Stock, Quilter, Lawrence, Whale, Clift
OXON Edgington, Smith, Inkpen, Snell, Batten, Brain