Only birth using ‘similar sounding variations’ on surname and christian names 1868+-2 give each nothing for an
L and one for Nathan:
BEEBY, NATHAN BURNYEAT mmn BURNYEAT
GRO Reference: 1866 D Quarter in WHITEHAVEN Volume 10B Page 512
An interesting aside:
Nathan on the 1871:
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:V5BG-DHTParents of the above married in Australia:
1855 310 BEEBY Nathan to STUBBS Elizabeth
It is the correct family, as birth of first son in VIC:
1859 12607 BEEBY Wm parents names Nathan and Elizth (Burnyeat)
Jamjar