Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Thomas Holmes  (Read 602 times)

Offline Yorkyboyl

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 150
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Thomas Holmes
« on: Thursday 13 December 18 16:37 GMT (UK) »
Could anyone help please with the death/burial details of Thomas Holmes, bapt. March 1830 Huttons Ambo, but lived in Snainton between 1861 and 1911, possibly longer. The best I have on his death is JFM 1921 Scarborough, age 90. I believe records for Snainton were transferred from one parish to another at some point, hence the Scarborough mention, although I don't think he ever lived there. His wife Mary died in 1913, also registered at  Scarborough.

  Thanks.

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,307
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Holmes
« Reply #1 on: Thursday 13 December 18 17:03 GMT (UK) »
Remember though - Scarborough Registration District covers Snainton from 1837  ;)
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline ciderdrinker

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,048
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Holmes
« Reply #2 on: Friday 14 December 18 12:54 GMT (UK) »
Hello
This is a burial at Snaiton
Thomas Holmes aged 90 of Ruston 19 th Jan 1921

He was alive in 1911 so it does look like him.
Mary also buried there 4.12.1913 age 77 Snaiton

Ciderdrinker

Offline Yorkyboyl

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 150
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Holmes
« Reply #3 on: Sunday 16 December 18 15:03 GMT (UK) »
Hi there,
    Yes, I'm pretty certain that's the correct Thomas. Another small piece in the jigsaw.

    Many thanks  B.
Pages: [1]