If I have time later today, I'll post a translation of the first page that you posted, which confirms that outcome.
... we pronounce, decree and declare that the marriage between the said Denis Hayfurth and the aforesaid Agnes that was effectively arranged, contracted and solemnized in the sight of the church was from the beginning, and now is, null and void; and we also pronounce, decree and declare that it did fall short, and now does fall short, of the force of a marriage because of a matrimonial pre-contract that previously existed between the said Charles Middleton and the same Agnes as above; and we decree that the same Denis and Agnes have each gone their own way in this matter in every effect, both in law and in deed, and they should be separated and divorced, and thus we do separate and divorce them; and to the said Denis Hayfurth we do grant and impart permission to marry; and we also charge the said Agnes with the lawful expenses that have arisen and that will arise in this case for and on behalf of both the said Charles Middleton and the same Denis Hayfurth, and (that she) be forced and compelled to the payment of the ecclesiastical expenses of the same, as we do decree by this our definitive sentence, or this our final decree, which we do issue and proclaim in these writings; furthermore, the taxation of these expenses must be reserved, and we do reserve it, to (be paid to) ourselves or to whatsoever other Judge may be empowered in this matter.
Issued 27 July 1605
