Author Topic: Estimated dates. Late 1800’s?  (Read 724 times)

Offline Earlsdau

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Estimated dates. Late 1800’s?
« on: Sunday 26 May 19 08:08 BST (UK) »
Would appreciate some expert eye to look at this rather poor quality photo and proffer an estimate of year/decade it was taken.

I do not have the original photo, so cannot give any more details other than I know the photo was taken in Australia.

Much appreciated

Earlsdau


Offline Trishanne

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,247
    • View Profile
Re: Family name - Meager. Location - Victoria, Australia
« Reply #1 on: Sunday 26 May 19 13:39 BST (UK) »
While waiting for the experts to come along and date this lovely photo, I've cleaned it up a little. If you could change the title of your post and add  date please it could help.
Pat
Bownass - Lancashire & Westmorland
Hoggarth - Lancashire & Westmorland
Jackson- Lancaster
Waller - Dent, Yorkshire dales
Omerod - Lancashire
Redburn - Lancashire
Evans - Hereford

RESTORERS please do not use my restores without my permission THANK YOU

Offline Little Nell

  • Global Moderator
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 11,805
    • View Profile
Re: Estimated dates. Late 1800’s?
« Reply #2 on: Sunday 26 May 19 15:49 BST (UK) »
From the lady's sleeve style, probably about 1897-99.

Hope that helps

Nell
All census information: Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,138
    • View Profile
Re: Estimated dates. Late 1800’s?
« Reply #3 on: Sunday 26 May 19 17:33 BST (UK) »
The sleeves might be deceptive, Nell, as they came back again in circa 1905-9 with the 'pigeon breast' blouse front.

I'm not sure which but Jim will know  :)

Gadget
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***


Offline jim1

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,472
  • ain't life grand
    • View Profile
Re: Estimated dates. Late 1800’s?
« Reply #4 on: Sunday 26 May 19 18:22 BST (UK) »
Mmmm. I had to have a long look at this, however I don't think as late as Edwardian in spite of the pigeon-breast looking bodice bib.
The " come back" sleeve was fuller & looser than this.
So around early-mid 1890's I would suggest, her hairstyle is typical of that decade & you won't see it as late as 1905, also there appears to be a small bustle back there which had faded in popularity around 1890 although yo can still see them up to mid 1890's.
If you know who they are they are married at this time & if you don't know who they are they are well.... married at this time.
Warks:Ashford;Cadby;Clarke;Clifford;Cooke Copage;Easthope;
Edmonds;Felton;Colledge;Lutwyche;Mander(s);May;Poole;Withers.
Staffs.Edmonds;Addison;Duffield;Webb;Fisher;Archer
Salop:Easthope,Eddowes,Hoorde,Oteley,Vernon,Talbot,De Neville.
Notts.Clarke;Redfearne;Treece.
Som.May;Perriman;Cox
India Kane;Felton;Cadby
London.Haysom.
Lancs.Gay.
Worcs.Coley;Mander;Sawyer.
Kings of Wessex & Scotland
Census information is Crown copyright,from
www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/

Offline John-76

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
    • View Profile
Re: Estimated dates. Late 1800’s?
« Reply #5 on: Sunday 26 May 19 19:09 BST (UK) »
Another quick one...
Blake, Willis, Parker and Whittington

Offline John-76

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
    • View Profile
Re: Estimated dates. Late 1800’s?
« Reply #6 on: Sunday 26 May 19 19:13 BST (UK) »
Sorry, I suppose a photo would help!
Blake, Willis, Parker and Whittington

Offline Earlsdau

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Estimated dates. Late 1800’s?
« Reply #7 on: Monday 27 May 19 06:04 BST (UK) »
So much thanks to you all for your date-setting.

The young couple who were number one in our calculations to be depicted in the photo were married in 1893, which makes them look to be the ones. Other possibilities were years before which puts them out of the running.

Also for the cleaning up of the photo - thank you!  :)

You’re legends!