I am continuing on my quest to unravel my 3x gt grandmother's confusing early life (see here for an earlier thread
https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=742598.0).
One of her relationships seems to have been with a Richard Froggatt/Froggitt, sometime Professor of Music. I have found him and his family on the 1841 census in Spitalfields. Richard's father, also called Richard, gives his profession as musician, a job that seems rather incongruous when surrounded by dressmakers, silk weavers, laundresses etc! HO107; Piece 710; Folio 36; Page 20
In 1851, Richard senior is still a Musician, but I think it also says Sergeant Militia. This time the family is in Limehouse (HO107; Piece 1554; Folio 170; Page 50). Richard junior is also describing himself as a musician, as is the second eldest son, Jack. Neither of them link to the militia in their job description.
From what I understand, the militia at this time were a bit like today's Territorial Army - you were required to do a certain amount of training etc every year, and could be called upon to serve when required, but that you would be expected to have a 'normal' job which would be your main source of income. Was this any different for a musician in the militia? And if you weren't in the militia, but giving your profession as a musician, would theatre halls and concerts have been your main source of income?