Author Topic: Marriage to deceased wife's sister  (Read 3657 times)

Offline Mabel Bagshawe

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,872
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage to deceased wife's sister
« Reply #27 on: Thursday 13 June 19 20:07 BST (UK) »
To note the 1939 register notes surnames both in 1939 and later on, so if you search Edith Worrow and find another surname that indicates that was her later, married surname

Offline J Bux

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 115
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage to deceased wife's sister
« Reply #28 on: Friday 14 June 19 08:19 BST (UK) »
Yes, the two or three names did surprise me at first, especially as the the marriages took place after 1939.  It must have been a working document for many years.
Buxton - (Derbyshire, Lincolnshire and Nottinghamshire)

Offline Maiden Stone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,226
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage to deceased wife's sister
« Reply #29 on: Friday 14 June 19 15:00 BST (UK) »
!
Yes, the two or three names did surprise me at first, especially as the the marriages took place after 1939.  It must have been a working document for many years.

Decades.
There are explanations and guidance notes about why it was compiled and what it was used for during and after the war.
Cowban

Offline K8T

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 417
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage to deceased wife's sister
« Reply #30 on: Sunday 16 June 19 18:14 BST (UK) »
On the 1939 Register Walter is living at 46 Gaunt St, Lincoln with Edith H Worrow, Leonard Marshall and Eric Marshall.  Edith's name has been changed to Marshall indicating that they married after 1939.

Hope this helps

K8T


Offline Gillg

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,671
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage to deceased wife's sister
« Reply #31 on: Monday 17 June 19 12:40 BST (UK) »
My gt-gt-aunt Rebecca Fairey married Thomas Benson in 1867 in London.  They emigrated to Kansas and had several children before she died in childbirth in 1877.  Thomas must have sent an SOS back to her family, as her younger sister Rachel quickly came out to Kansas, followed by her mother and brother. Rachel married her widowed brother-in-law Thomas in 1878, the year following her sister Rebecca's death, and went on to have a large family with him.  Thomas and Rachel were a highly respected couple in the community and nobody seems to have been too shocked at the man who married his dead wife's sister.  Needs must, I expect, in what was then a fairly primitive society, or maybe there were different rules in the US.
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

FAIREY/FAIRY/FAREY/FEARY, LAWSON, CHURCH, BENSON, HALSTEAD from Easton, Ellington, Eynesbury, Gt Catworth, Huntingdon, Spaldwick, Hunts;  Burnley, Lancs;  New Zealand, Australia & US.

HURST, BOLTON,  BUTTERWORTH, ADAMSON, WILD, MCIVOR from Milnrow, Newhey, Oldham & Rochdale, Lancs., Scotland.

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,142
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage to deceased wife's sister
« Reply #32 on: Monday 17 June 19 12:55 BST (UK) »
From memory of history lessons many years ago, wasn't Catherine of Aragon married to Henry Vlll's elder brother, Arthur.

Add- implying that there was one rule for men and another for women!
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline Fisherman

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,158
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage to deceased wife's sister
« Reply #33 on: Monday 17 June 19 13:22 BST (UK) »
Spot on Gadget
Henry was allowed to marry Catherine because she said her marriage to Arthur had not been consumated.
When no son was produced he divorced her saying that it was a sign that he had displeased God.
Sockett in Shropshire, Montgomeryshire, Herefordshire, Monmouthshire, Glamorgan and probably the rest of the UK
Corbet/t in Shropshire, Norfolk, Worcestershire
Gambold in South West Wales, USA, Australia
Baylis/s in Gloucestershire, South Wales
Richards in Breconshire
Manthorpe in Shropshire, Norfolk, Cheshire, Suffolk

Offline Maiden Stone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,226
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage to deceased wife's sister
« Reply #34 on: Monday 17 June 19 14:00 BST (UK) »
Spot on Gadget
Henry was allowed to marry Catherine because she said her marriage to Arthur had not been consumated.
When no son was produced he divorced her saying that it was a sign that he had displeased God.
… and the rest is history....
Catherine had 3 sons, 2 were stillborn or died soon after birth and one lived almost 2 months.
King Henry VII didn't want to send her back to Spain after Arthur died because he needed her dowry.
Cowban