Author Topic: Divorce in the 1860s  (Read 1583 times)

Offline Retriever

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 523
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Divorce in the 1860s
« on: Monday 10 June 19 15:50 BST (UK) »
On a marriage certificate of 1869 it states that the groom was divorced from his former wife.

That marriage was registered in 1861, and they had a son.

I am surprised that a divorced person could be re-married in an Anglican church at that time or even that divorce was an option then.

Has anybody else come across divorce and re-marriage in church this early?


Offline Milliepede

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,001
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Divorce in the 1860s
« Reply #1 on: Monday 10 June 19 15:56 BST (UK) »
I looked it up and there was an Act in 1857 allowing husbands to divorce their wives for adultery but not the other way around.

Other reasons for divorce didn't come in until much later. 
Hinchliffe - Huddersfield Wiltshire
Burroughs - Arlingham Glos
Pick - Frocester Glos

Offline Retriever

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 523
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Divorce in the 1860s
« Reply #2 on: Monday 10 June 19 16:02 BST (UK) »
Thanks for that Milliepede.

That could be the reason for the divorce as the son was rebaptised, the record showing him as the son of the father and second wife.

I am still surprised a divorcee was allowed a marriage in church in the 1860s.

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,681
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Divorce in the 1860s
« Reply #3 on: Monday 10 June 19 16:25 BST (UK) »
I have a lady who married in 1850, then obtained a divorce from the husband, and re-married in 1873 under her maiden-name as a "Divorced woman".

Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY


Offline emeltom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,449
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Divorce in the 1860s
« Reply #4 on: Monday 10 June 19 16:28 BST (UK) »
Perhaps it was down to the discretion of the Vicar.

Emeltom
Smith Tiplady Boulton Branthwaite King Miller Woolfall Bretherton Archer and many more

Offline ShaunJ

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,076
    • View Profile
Re: Divorce in the 1860s
« Reply #5 on: Monday 10 June 19 16:34 BST (UK) »
Divorce papers from that period are viewable on Ancestry https://www.ancestry.co.uk/search/collections/divorcerecords/
UK Census info. Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,681
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Divorce in the 1860s
« Reply #6 on: Monday 10 June 19 16:42 BST (UK) »
Yes, I've got a copy of the divorce papers.  He was the adulterer.

Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline ThrelfallYorky

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,647
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Divorce in the 1860s
« Reply #7 on: Monday 10 June 19 16:46 BST (UK) »
I must admit I'm a bit surprised that at that time the "guilty party" of a divorce could re-marry in a church. I'd a feeling that the "innocent" one might have been able to, but not the other.....
Threlfall (Southport), Isherwood (lancs & Canada), Newbould + Topliss(Derby), Keating & Cummins (Ireland + lancs), Fisher, Strong& Casson (all Cumberland) & Downie & Bowie, Linlithgow area Scotland . Also interested in Leigh& Burrows,(Lancashire) Griffiths (Shropshire & lancs), Leaver (Lancs/Yorks) & Anderson(Cumberland and very elusive)

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,681
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Divorce in the 1860s
« Reply #8 on: Monday 10 June 19 16:58 BST (UK) »
I haven't checked it out, but a "gentleman" of the same name married, also in 1873, in the area he moved to.  He said that he was a widower.



Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY