Sunderland St Mary's RC church 1862, look up please?

[guest259648]

Please help with a Marriage record 1862 (24 Feb I think).
Sunderland, Co. Durham.
St Mary's Roman Catholic Church Parish register. Church is at 27 Bridge Street Sunderland.

Can anyone see the original of this record please?
All I have is a typed index and I think it's been mistranscribed, it makes no sense.

Parties are Henry McAtaminey + Bridget Murphy.
I'm questioning the "James I. Derry" given as the groom's father, this can't be right...?

Thank you.

[emeltom]

It could be correct if Bridget was a widow when she married Hugh.

[softly softly]

The grooms father not the brides

John

Edit: misread transcription--sorry.

[guest259648]

The grooms father not the brides

John

Edit: misread transcription--sorry.

Hello to emeltom, johnhood, many thanks for contributing.

... but I'm now very confused.

The INDEX that I can see (typed) says this:

Henry McAtaminey, father is "James I Derry"
Bridget Murphy, father is Matthew. (Residence Seaton Colliery.)

I believe Bridget would be young, the 1861 census suggests she's 18, so very unlikely to be a widow.

What can you see? The indexed name I can see is HENRY, not Hugh... is it Hugh?

[JenB]

This is what Family Search shows. Unfortunately the original image isn't available

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:NNKB-HPS

[guest259648]

This is what Family Search shows. Unfortunately the original image isn't available

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:NNKB-HPS

JenB
Thank you for looking.
Unfortunately I can never get into Family Search, I've tried many times to register, but it rejects my email address!

Would you kindly type here what you can see?

D

[JenB]

Here you are

[emeltom]

It was Henry - not sure where I got Hugh from, probably another query on another forum!

[guest259648]

It was Henry - not sure where I got Hugh from, probably another query on another forum!

jenB
Thank you :-)

[Hugh - there are indeed Hugh Mcatamineys in N.Ireland; easy to do.]

Now, this Family Search image shows the same as what I can see through the online sites I subscribe to.
However, I've also just been shown the Latin version which, I assume, would be what's written in the church register: and Henry's father is named as merely JACOBI (= James, I think?).

So, what could a transcriber have seen, which prompted them to write this James-I-Derry?

What info. was placed on the non-church register, in 1862, in addition to the parties' names?

D