« Reply #5 on: Thursday 24 June 21 18:09 BST (UK) »
Reality is people travelled, to where work was, as they often lived in tied cottages belonging to their employer if there was no work or they got fired they were also without a home, so of course they travelled and some consistantly travelled to find work.
However it is not the 'travel distance' it is proving individual people who just happened to use the same surname are even somehow related and that comes down to real records and pre civil registration ( 1837) that is where you have the issue as detailed connecting records are hard to find...... as you might find in the same village "John Bottomley baptised on xx 1740" giving no connection to parents and later in the same village a marriage between "John Bottomley and Mary Kane married on xx 1765" is it the same John Bottomley being baptised and later married or not...could it be that ther are 4 John Bottomley living in the same village born around the same time, or an 'incomier' from elsewhere, you have no way of knowing if there is no details of connection,
Online there are trees of 'my ancestry' none that I have seen are correct as far as I can see they each have copied their tree from other online trees and the first one just name hunted to find a name that would fit what they wanted,
Leicestershire:Chamberlain, Dakin, Wilkinson, Moss, Cook, Welland, Dobson, Roper,Palfreman, Squires, Hames, Goddard, Topliss, Twells,Bacon.
Northamps:Sykes, Harris, Rice,Knowles.
Rutland:Clements, Dalby, Osbourne, Durance, Smith,Christian, Royce, Richardson,Oakham, Dewey,Newbold,Cox,Chamberlaine,Brow, Cooper, Bloodworth,Clarke
Durham/Yorks:Woodend, Watson,Parker, Dowser
Suffolk/Norfolk:Groom, Coleman, Kemp, Barnard, Alden,Blomfield,Smith,Howes,Knight,Kett,Fryston
Lincolnshire:Clements, Woodend