Author Topic: 1822 marriage look up request  (Read 2834 times)

Offline hanes teulu

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,596
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1822 marriage look up request
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday 24 April 24 20:28 BST (UK) »
Have you discounted the Mary Bradley, bap 30 Oct 1801, Chelmsford?

That she was "of the parish of Roxwell" at marriage does not mean that she was from that Parish.

Offline Olicana

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 380
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1822 marriage look up request
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday 24 April 24 21:23 BST (UK) »
Thank you for the marriage link Willsy.

Thank you for your suggestion hanes teulu. I wondered about that possibility. Does the baptism say anything about the parents?

Offline hanes teulu

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,596
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1822 marriage look up request
« Reply #11 on: Wednesday 24 April 24 21:35 BST (UK) »
As a starter, track the Mary Bradley, Chelmsford re. death/marriage in order to rule her out. 

Offline Olicana

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 380
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1822 marriage look up request
« Reply #12 on: Friday 26 April 24 14:27 BST (UK) »
The only extra details I have found for the Mary baptised in Chelmsford are that her parents were John and Mary Bradley. Can anyone see this baptism on 30 October 1801 and let me know her father's occupation please?


Offline hanes teulu

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,596
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1822 marriage look up request
« Reply #13 on: Friday 26 April 24 15:05 BST (UK) »
Baptismal registers that included a column "Occupation/Profession" were introduced around 1811/12. Quite likely the information may not be present on the 1801 record. I only have sight of the transcript - which does not provide occupation. But transcripts do not always capture the  original in full.