« Reply #6 on: Monday 12 June 23 21:16 BST (UK) »
Thank you all for the information shared. It just struck me today it would have affected the income of the family if, like my grandmother, you were expecting a child to become a wage earner only to find out they had to stay at school for another year. I know this change in the system had been talked about for years before the act was passed. I now know from Shaun’s answer that her youngest would have stayed for the extra year. She also had two sone who were not old enough to join in with with war effort but would have been called up for national service. I don’t think she would have been best pleased about that either!
Good to know that people like your husband Victoria - who obviously had aptitude was spotted and had some training.
Thanks all
So your family event would have taken place around 1947 then if they had to stay on another year at school.
Researching:
LONDON, Coombs, Roberts, Auber, Helsdon, Fradine, Morin, Goodacre
DORSET Coombs, Munday
NORFOLK Helsdon, Riches, Harbord, Budery
KENT Roberts, Goodacre
SUSSEX Walder, Boniface, Dinnage, Standen, Lee, Botten, Wickham, Jupp
SUFFOLK Titshall, Frost, Fairweather, Mayhew, Archer, Eade, Scarfe
DURHAM Stewart, Musgrave, Wilson, Forster
SCOTLAND Stewart in Selkirk
USA Musgrave, Saix
ESSEX Cornwell, Stock, Quilter, Lawrence, Whale, Clift
OXON Edgington, Smith, Inkpen, Snell, Batten, Brain