Author Topic: May 1836 marriage  (Read 462 times)

Offline elaine gray

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 274
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
May 1836 marriage
« on: Thursday 11 April 24 14:39 BST (UK) »
Hi folks, Margaret Hughes and Patrick Carolan married Roman Catholic marriage.
Not seeing mention of father which would be huge help in solving mystery.
Did they not note name then or am I missing it somewhere else.??
Cheers
E

Online CaroleW

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 71,291
  • Barney 1993-2004
    • View Profile
Re: May 1836 marriage
« Reply #1 on: Thursday 11 April 24 14:44 BST (UK) »
Fathers names only appear on marriages from 1.7.1837 when Civil Registration was introduced
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Carlin (Ireland & Liverpool) Doughty & Wright (Liverpool) Dick & Park (Scotland & Liverpool)

Offline elaine gray

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 274
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: May 1836 marriage
« Reply #2 on: Thursday 11 April 24 14:54 BST (UK) »
Oh , so I've just missed getting that. Now I know.
Many many thanks 😊

Online CaroleW

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 71,291
  • Barney 1993-2004
    • View Profile
Re: May 1836 marriage
« Reply #3 on: Thursday 11 April 24 14:56 BST (UK) »
They married at St Peters which was an Anglican church.  Married 3.5.1836

Matthew Clarke & Catherine O'Hare were witnesses
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Carlin (Ireland & Liverpool) Doughty & Wright (Liverpool) Dick & Park (Scotland & Liverpool)


Offline elaine gray

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 274
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: May 1836 marriage
« Reply #4 on: Thursday 11 April 24 15:03 BST (UK) »
Oh thanks for that. I assumed RC,  as my Hughes were RC. Maybe I have wrong Margaret, but don't think so.
I will plod on .......
E

Offline lancsann

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,476
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: May 1836 marriage
« Reply #5 on: Thursday 11 April 24 16:48 BST (UK) »
Until the Marriage Act of 1836 marriages in the RC church were not considered legal so a couple would often be married in both the RC church and a C of E to satisfy the both the legal & religious aspects. Not sure when the act became law so May may have been before that.
Even after 1836 a 'mixed' marriage of a RC & a Cof E couple would often have been celebrated in both churches and it gives a double registration in the GRO files. I have one example in my own tree.

Offline elaine gray

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 274
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: May 1836 marriage
« Reply #6 on: Thursday 11 April 24 16:53 BST (UK) »
Hi, love learning new things, so thanks for that.  Margaret was def RC
E

Online garstonite

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 11,899
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: May 1836 marriage
« Reply #7 on: Friday 12 April 24 08:40 BST (UK) »
in case you didn't know - Patrick was a Stone Mason

Marriage: 3 May 1836 St Peter, Liverpool, Lancashire
Patrick Carolan - Stone Mason, This Parish
Margaret Hughes - (X), Spinster, This Parish
    Witnesses: Matthew Clarke; Catherine O'Hare (X)
    Married by Banns by Richard Appleton, Curate
    Register: Marriages 1834 - 1836, Page 346, Entry 1038
    Source: LDS Film 94018
oakes,liverpool..neston..backford..poulton cum spittal(bebington)middlewich,cheshire......   sacht,helgoland  .......merrick,herefordshire adams,shropshire...tipping..ellis..  jones,garston,liverpool..hartley.dunham massey..barker. salford

Offline elaine gray

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 274
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: May 1836 marriage
« Reply #8 on: Friday 12 April 24 09:04 BST (UK) »
Not sure if I did, that's interesting as my ancestor ,the one I'm researching was also a stonemason.
Thanks
E