Author Topic: DNA testing  (Read 3416 times)

Offline carol80

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,645
  • Edwin Stonehouse 1906-1970
    • View Profile
DNA testing
« on: Saturday 24 August 24 22:28 BST (UK) »
Hi, I know nothing about DNA.
 1. I am thinking about taking a DNA test. But who with? Ancestry has so many wrong trees so am I wasting my money testing with them. Mind you other sites are just as bad so is it worth a go.
 2. My late husband was adopted is it worth my son taking a DNA test to see if we can trace my son's grandfather.

Basic questions but as I said I know nothing about DNA.
Any help would be much appreciated
Carol (NZ)
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Stonehouse(York,Durham,Canada)Laurie(Scotland,York)Biddiss(All)Love(Scotland,Australia) Byers(Durham)Demaine(York)Dennison(York)Raine(Durham)Jefferson(Durham)Muir(Durham)
Johnston (Scotland)Hunter(Scotland)Johnson(York)
and many more.

Offline Biggles50

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,423
    • View Profile
Re: DNA testing
« Reply #1 on: Saturday 24 August 24 22:41 BST (UK) »
Without doubt an Ancestry DNA test is the one to go for, simply because they have vastly more test takers than all the others added together (more or less).

Who ever you go with you will find tree errors, user names that offer no clues, no trees at all etc.

Yes it is worth your Son taking an Ancestry DNA test as well and one of your Cousins from each side of your family.

Only buy them when on offer which can be £59.99 plus postage, return postage is free.  The sample if first posted to Ireland where they are collected then sent to the Labs in the USA, this part can take up to three weeks.  For an extra £10 you can get Priority Processing and for the lest test I sent it took 4 weeks from putting the sample in the post to receiving the results.

Sign up to this free DNA Genealogy course.

https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/genealogy

If you read this thread it should help.

https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=863488.0

Offline Biggles50

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,423
    • View Profile
Re: DNA testing
« Reply #2 on: Saturday 24 August 24 22:42 BST (UK) »
Also

Buy this book


Offline Ayashi

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,926
  • Lost in the DNA rabbit hole
    • View Profile
Re: DNA testing
« Reply #3 on: Saturday 24 August 24 22:44 BST (UK) »
I use Ancestry but with only one test I obviously can't compare with other sites so can't be much help there. You are right that there are so many trees that are utterly atrocious but I have managed to DNA connect quite a lot of my family paperwork, which is nice. I also managed to prove I had the right suspect family for a fatherless illegitimacy and have big suspicions about a different illegitimacy on a different branch. It also brings confusion and mystery though, since I have a number of people in DNA clumps where I can't work out how they are supposed to be related.

When it comes to your son, it will of course depend on who else has tested for him to match against, but at least if you and he test on the same site he will be able to determine which of his matches are maternal and which must be paternal. He may get close relatives or he may get cousins (of various degrees of separation) on his paternal side and begin to cobble together a tree based on common ancestors with them.


Offline carol80

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,645
  • Edwin Stonehouse 1906-1970
    • View Profile
Re: DNA testing
« Reply #4 on: Saturday 24 August 24 23:30 BST (UK) »
Just had a quick read but will read later to absorb what you have said.
No Cousins I'm afraid.
Husband only child. (that we know of)
On my side, Mother and Father are both only children.
I am in New Zealand and both Ancestry and MY Heritage have specials till 1st September which is Father's Day here.

Thank you for replying.
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Stonehouse(York,Durham,Canada)Laurie(Scotland,York)Biddiss(All)Love(Scotland,Australia) Byers(Durham)Demaine(York)Dennison(York)Raine(Durham)Jefferson(Durham)Muir(Durham)
Johnston (Scotland)Hunter(Scotland)Johnson(York)
and many more.

Offline rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 43,914
  • ALFIE 2009 - 2021 (Rosbercon Sky's the Limit)
    • View Profile
Re: DNA testing
« Reply #5 on: Sunday 25 August 24 00:02 BST (UK) »
I have just tested with Ancestry, it took around 2 weeks for the test kit to arrive and nearly 6 weeks from posting the test to them.  I would wait and see what results and matches you get before spending more money on books, I bought the book and have not found it useful so far. There is plenty of good advice on here.
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline rebeccaclaire86

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
  • I'm not stuck, I'm ancestrally challenged...
    • View Profile
Re: DNA testing
« Reply #6 on: Sunday 25 August 24 00:06 BST (UK) »
Ancestry is best as you can download your results and upload them to My Heritage for free. I have very different matches on both sites so it’s been really useful.
Buckinghamshire; Bignell, Talbot, Janes, Gibbs
Cambrigeshire; Cockerton, Sharpe, Purkis
Hertfordshire; Rolph, Bigg, Marvell, Pateman, Hornsby, Jenkins
Norfolk; Crowfoot, Randlesome
London; Wyatt, Yarroll
Somerset; Date, Hodder, Leatherby, Webb
Suffolk; Palfrey, Yallop, Kerry, Codling, Steward, Pettitt
Ireland & Canada; Hanna, Teel, Cowin, Switzer

Offline Lisa in California

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,646
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio
    • View Profile
Re: DNA testing
« Reply #7 on: Sunday 25 August 24 01:41 BST (UK) »
My reply doesn’t answer your question, but perhaps some of it may be helpful.  In no particular order…

As you may have read previously, are you prepared for any unexpected results.  Personally, I would rather know the truth but I helped a family friend with his tree (just his tree, not DNA testing) and he was devastated when he found out his ancestors were from a different country than what he was told his whole life.

When you take the test, make sure you closely follow the instructions. Hubby, our younger son and I took the test at the same time, it took three tests before hubby received results. (Thankfully, we only had to pay for his first test.)

I am quite interested in looking through others’ trees when I’m bored.  When I see an error I just move on to the next tree.  I never copy their trees but do keep in mind their findings and do my own research.

A friend had his DNA tested.  We found out his maternal grandfather was not his biological grandfather but apparently was someone who married his grandmother late into her pregnancy.  Due to numerous extended family members having their DNA tested prior to my friend’s test, we found his biological grandfather’s family rather quickly (we have not yet narrowed down which brother was the bio grandfather, though).  Also, we found several photographs in the Ancestry trees - friend’s mother looked very similar to her half-sister, friend also looked like his “cousin”.

Perhaps you’ll be just as fortunate with your outcomes.
Ellison: Co. Wicklow/Canada       Fowley: Sligo/Canada       Furnival: Lancashire/Canada       Ibbotson: Sheffield/Canada       Lee/DeJongh: Lancashire & Cheshire       Mumford: Essex/Canada       Ovens: Ireland/Canada       Sarge: Yorkshire/Canada             Stuart: Sligo/Canada       Sullivan: Co. Clare/Canada      Vaus: Sussex/Surrey      Wakefield: Tuam or Ballinasloe, Ireland              (Surname: Originated/Place Last Lived)  (Canadians lived in Ontario)

Offline Ruskie

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,273
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: DNA testing
« Reply #8 on: Sunday 25 August 24 08:14 BST (UK) »
Keep in mind that with an Ancestry DNA test, you will need to keep up your subscription to get full benefits from your results. They are gradually reducing the number of basic features which you can see without a sub, and I wouldn’t be surprised if there are further reductions in the pipeline on what you can view for free. They are also adding features which require an additional subscription.

I took an Ancestry DNA test about 18 months ago and since then some features that used to be included, have now been removed, I find it to be of limited use.

My bad luck, but most matches I have contacted have not replied. I suspect a lot of people are only seeking ethncity (the ads have worked) and are not interested in family tree research.

A lot of people have better experiences with Ancestry than I have, and yes, definitely upload your raw data to other companies.