1682 Latin Probate for the Will of Francis Norwood

[Wayne N]

Is it possible to have the following Latin probate checked?

For the most part, I think it's ok.
The last word of line 5 may be incorrect and the repeat of D(omi)ni in the line above.
The last line also has issues

Thanks Wayne


Probatum fuit hoc Testamentum apud Glouc(ester)
Decimo Septimo die mensis Martij  Anno Domini 1682
Coram ven(erabi)li viro Richardo Parsons, Legum Bacc(alaur)eo, Reverendi
in Christo Patris ac Domini, D(omi)ni Roberti permissione
divina Glouc(estrensis) Episcopi Vicario in spi(ritua)libus gen(era)li(bus)
&c, Ac per eum approbatum et insinuatum &c.
Commissaque fuit et est administratio &c. Execut(ori)
&c debite prius jurato &c. salvo iure &c.
Fest(o) St Joh(ann)is Bapt(istae)
Præc(entorum) p. Jn.

[Bookbox]

The last word of line 5 is gen(era)li [agrees with Vicario]

Domini D(omi)ni is correct. The middle section works like this:
… before the Worshipful Richard Parsons, Bachelor of Laws, Vicar-General in spiritual affairs of the Reverend Father and Lord in Christ, Lord Robert, by divine permission Bishop of Gloucester …

I think the last bit gives the date on which the inventory is required:
Fest(o) S(anc)t(i) Joh(ann)is Bapt(iste)
prox(imo) p(ro) In(ventario)

ADDED
I wouldn't trouble with case-endings for Gloucester. It's perfectly acceptable just to put Glouc'.

[Wayne N]

Thank you kindly Bookbox

Very much appreciate the corrections with explanations