Author Topic: hambridge family on there canal boat.  (Read 41862 times)

Offline polarbear

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,377
    • View Profile
Re: hambridge family on there canal boat.
« Reply #90 on: Thursday 25 October 18 18:49 BST (UK) »
Well, I just typed a reply and couldn't get it to post so I will try again.

From https://www.freebmd.org.uk/cgi/search.pl ....

There is a marriage for a Thomas HaNbridge to an Emma Walker in the Dec qtr 1881. The original image of the parish record is available on ancestry and has the name spelled with an N as well.

Thomas Hanbridge 23 Bachelor Labourer of South Banbury Father James Hanbridge Labourer
Emma Walker 18 Spinster of South Banbury Father John Walker Labourer
03 Dec 1881 in the Parish Church of South Banbury
Thomas and Emma signed with their mark (x)
Witnesses Henry Harwood (marked his x) and Ellen Walker who signed for herself.

PB
We search for information but it is up to the thread owner to verify that it is correct.

British Census copyright The National Archives; Canadian Census copyright Library and Archives Canada

Offline kirsty.foreman

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 401
    • View Profile
Re: hambridge family on there canal boat.
« Reply #91 on: Thursday 25 October 18 19:35 BST (UK) »
Well, I just typed a reply and couldn't get it to post so I will try again.

From https://www.freebmd.org.uk/cgi/search.pl ....

There is a marriage for a Thomas HaNbridge to an Emma Walker in the Dec qtr 1881. The original image of the parish record is available on ancestry and has the name spelled with an N as well.

Thomas Hanbridge 23 Bachelor Labourer of South Banbury Father James Hanbridge Labourer
Emma Walker 18 Spinster of South Banbury Father John Walker Labourer
03 Dec 1881 in the Parish Church of South Banbury
Thomas and Emma signed with their mark (x)
Witnesses Henry Harwood (marked his x) and Ellen Walker who signed for herself.

PB
I take it Ellen walker would of been a sister or cousin. And I also take it Henry harwood might of been a family friend ?.

Offline keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,056
    • View Profile
Re: hambridge family on there canal boat.
« Reply #92 on: Thursday 25 October 18 19:41 BST (UK) »
Hi again, their is a family living in Banbury headed by a John Walker with wife Sarah with children including Emma b 1862 Banbury mmn Jellyman and a sister Ellen b c 1867 Banbury
1871 RG10/1464/58/8
1881 RG11/1527/77/28
Keyboard86
Pelly/Pelley/Kingsbury/Challis/Nalder/Rochester/Raydenbow

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline kirsty.foreman

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 401
    • View Profile
Re: hambridge family on there canal boat.
« Reply #93 on: Thursday 25 October 18 19:44 BST (UK) »
Hi again, their is a family living in Banbury headed by a John Walker with wife Sarah with children including Emma b 1862 Banbury mmn Jellyman and a sister Ellen b c 1867 Banbury
1871 RG10/1464/58/8
1881 RG11/1527/77/28
Keyboard86
hi is a jellyman a boy or a girl


Offline keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,056
    • View Profile
Re: hambridge family on there canal boat.
« Reply #94 on: Thursday 25 October 18 19:53 BST (UK) »
 :) mmn is short for Mothers maiden name.
Keyboard86
Pelly/Pelley/Kingsbury/Challis/Nalder/Rochester/Raydenbow

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline kirsty.foreman

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 401
    • View Profile
Re: hambridge family on there canal boat.
« Reply #95 on: Thursday 25 October 18 20:03 BST (UK) »
:) mmn is short for Mothers maiden name.
Keyboard86
sorry just a bit confused I take it it's Sarah maiden name and I take it she only had 2 girls

Offline keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,056
    • View Profile
Re: hambridge family on there canal boat.
« Reply #96 on: Thursday 25 October 18 20:08 BST (UK) »
:) mmn is short for Mothers maiden name.
Keyboard86
sorry just a bit confused I take it it's Sarah maiden name and I take it she only had 2 girls

I only showed the two who were at the marriage, in 1871 we have John 37 Sarah 31 William 16 Elizabeth 12 Emma 10 Ellen 4 Fanny 5 or 3 Jane 1
Keyboard86

PS John Walker married Sarah Jellyman March qtr 1858 Banbury
Pelly/Pelley/Kingsbury/Challis/Nalder/Rochester/Raydenbow

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline kirsty.foreman

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 401
    • View Profile
Re: hambridge family on there canal boat.
« Reply #97 on: Thursday 25 October 18 20:21 BST (UK) »
:) mmn is short for Mothers maiden name.
Keyboard86
sorry just a bit confused I take it it's Sarah maiden name and I take it she only had 2 girls

I only showed the two who were at the marriage, in 1871 we have John 37 Sarah 31 William 16 Elizabeth 12 Emma 10 Ellen 4 Fanny 5 or 3 Jane 1
Keyboard86

PS John Walker married Sarah Jellyman March qtr 1858 Banbury
thank you would Emma Hambridge had a middle name with the name j in it it's just I camed a cross a Emma j Hambridge

Offline keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,056
    • View Profile
Re: hambridge family on there canal boat.
« Reply #98 on: Thursday 25 October 18 20:26 BST (UK) »
Hi I have shown you the birth registration of an Emma Walker b 1862 Banbury with mothers maiden name Jellyman, and the census returns for Emma in 1871 & 1881 in Banbury, why bring up an Emma with a middle initial "J" ?
Keyboard86
Pelly/Pelley/Kingsbury/Challis/Nalder/Rochester/Raydenbow

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk