In an attempt to redeem myself from my previous blooper ...
It went from Liverpool St. to the sunken Rd.
There's also a write-up of the operation which proved unsuccessful for
a variety of reasons....
Thanks Jim

(1) You got me going back to the diaries and re-reading the Orders, which I assume is where you better deduced their position too. And now I totally agree with you! (2) Not a blooper in the slightest - but I'm more than happy to have an even closer identification of where Thomas Beach fell.
There's also a write-up of the operation which proved unsuccessful for a variety of reasons
Can you guess what I'm going to ask?!

Where on earth is that gem hidden? I read all of the 2/8th Warwickshire War Diary pages ranging from the start of 1916 to June 1917 and all I saw in 1916 were Plans, Operation Orders and the daily diary entries.
I did notice that in August, after having conducted several raids since they arrived, that a specifically titled "Raid Order" was issued, with far more explicit instruction on goals of the raid, how to conduct the raid and details right down to wearing the blacked face. I wonder if this order was in response to the mixed results of the previous raids.
I saw only one 'Report on a Raid' and that was a raid completed in January 2017. I can't find any other reports or analysis of an completed operation.
Where did you find your report referring to the one of 26th June 1916, Jim?