My query is about a wife's description of her husband's occupation on their child's birth certificate in WW1. He was a Private with 2/8th Battalion Warwickshire, these details most of which she recorded. But then she added "(General Labourer)"at the end. This was in Dec 1915 when I think his battalion was probably still in England. (Happy to be corrected)
I believe the 2/8th Warwickshire arrived in France in May 1916. Her husband was killed "in action", 6 months after the birth, on 26th June.
He was killed just before the Battle of the Somme started, so I guess he was at the front between Givenchy and Arras or Amiens. (The location I am just guessing from information in newspapers and his subsequent burial at Pont Du Hem). From Soldiers Effects registers I can tell that only a handful of soldiers from the 2/8th died on the same day as my uncle.
I am curious about "General Labourer". I realise that trenches had to be dug, structures built and general tasks had to be done. Was this something most Privates had to pitch in with - or was it a formal job given to a few? I have read that Labour Corps were being formed early 1916 to support Battalions.
I've also read that "From early 1916 onwards conscripted men with health too poor for fighting were also assigned to these battalions (ie Labour Corps), twelve of which had been formed by June that year". In his civilian life he was a salesman, probably on the skinny side from unemployment - not obvious manual labourer material. Perhaps they managed to feed him up in the Army.
As far as I know, he wasn't conscripted, his number was reg no 3730 and in the few records of his service still existing, I haven't found any reference to his Corps other than he was in the Royal Warwickshire Regiment. He would have enlisted in Birmingham and was older than the average soldier, he was 37 when he died. (Although his age is incorrectly recorded as 27 by the Army).
Has anyone come across "General Labourer" as a soldier's description before and does anyone know more details of what this may have meant?
Your thoughts are much appreciated.