I agree with every statement by Enumerators, that it is a very eye straining, demanding service.
On another thread, I pointed out that the Census enumerators were under a tremendous handicap, which today most people cannot imagine.
Back in 1841 in the country areas, families would have kept the same spelling for surnames because the enumerator would be a member of the same community and understand the accent.
There was a dead line for the returns to be delivered so all forms had to be sent out, filled in (often by some who were illiterate) and the the enumerator had to collect and copy the entries..What by? candle or oil lamp.
Later Census's in Towns and cities many would have strong country accents ,open to misunderstandings.
During the war I stayed with a Great Uncle and Aunt who only had gas lighting.and it was a great strain on the eyes.So one just did not read for long ! I am not at all surprised that there were many mistakes.
However the question is, do you report a misinterpretation,? for which you have sure and certain proof.Certificates, researched Parish records or whatever. After all it will only be marked as a possible alternative spelling or a maiden name.
I think that one should, as I would not have been able to find five relatives without being given an alternative.
The classic being a florid hand which joined a second initial J to a Surname C ..it came out as an H ..Thanks to a Rootschatter who found my family in 1891!!Of course I corrected that on Ancestry, why should another researcher miss a contact with me or Visa versa.
My belief is, that one should do so, It is certainly no reflection those who work so hard to get the records on line. And for them I am ever greatful ...Thankyou
Spring