Author Topic: 1861 census lookup request-COMPLETED  (Read 5102 times)

Offline heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,868
    • View Profile
Re: 1861 census lookup request
« Reply #27 on: Tuesday 02 December 08 19:16 GMT (UK) »
Now... I know that Edward Hooton and Mary Wood have been mentioned as a couple.
IGI has Selena b 1831 as a daughter -submitted by a member and Selena died in Michigan.
This is 'verified ' in 1841 (no relationships given but together as a family).
Edward in this case was born c 1796 so he would be getting on a bit to be having children post 1862 - if that is the assertion.
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Mum44

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,141
    • View Profile
Re: 1861 census lookup request
« Reply #28 on: Tuesday 02 December 08 19:36 GMT (UK) »


I think that is what Trisha originally believed - but there is now a second Edward, younger, who married in 1862  ???   

This applies also to Mary -  the "original" Mary, born 1810 Eastbourne - would have been 52 at marriage in 1862  ???

I think we are safe in saying that the Edward and Mary who married in London in 1862 were not the "original" Edward and Mary  :-\

Plus, Geoff has found (other thread ) Edward aged 82 living with another daughter  :-\
Census information is Crown Copyright from TNA.
Titchfield, Hampshire: Reed,  Fielder, Cawte, Goddard.
Kent:  Float,  Cutbush. 
Wallasey, Cheshire: Carroll, Ledsham.
Liverpool : Horsfall, Prescott

Offline GeoffE

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,995
  • Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1861 census lookup request
« Reply #29 on: Tuesday 02 December 08 19:39 GMT (UK) »
This applies also to Mary -  the "original" Mary, born 1810 Eastbourne - would have been 52 at marriage in 1862  ???

 and she was still in Pinchbeck in 1871 (WITCHLADE).
Don't cry because its over. Smile because it happened.

Offline heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,868
    • View Profile
Re: 1861 census lookup request
« Reply #30 on: Tuesday 02 December 08 19:49 GMT (UK) »
I think I am following the original Edward and Mary.

Has anyone found Edward and Mary Hooton post marriage in 1862?


IGI has the extracted marriage Edward Hooton and Mary Wishlade or Woods  ??? ??? ???
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,868
    • View Profile
Re: 1861 census lookup request
« Reply #31 on: Tuesday 02 December 08 20:27 GMT (UK) »
There is a marriage 1847 for William Rudkin and Caroline Hooton Westlade/Westlake - presumably variants of Wishlade so this would lead you to think that the children were illegitimate, having Hooton as a middle name. However,she is with Edward and Mary in 1841 - no relationships given.
BUT if these (1841) are the children of Edward Hooton and Mary Wishlade- then are the others Frances et al not?? Frances is on IGI as Wishleat with mother Mary. no father). They are all being born around the same time - and why would Frances be in the workhouse?

Interestingly (if you go for this kind of thing) Selina and Elizabeth were both christened - same day in 1849 - wonder if these were adult baptisms of the same children of 1841 and they were then baptised as Hooton??


Tricia- please look over everything, then when you have sorted it  ;D ;D ;D let us know!

Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline GeoffE

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,995
  • Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1861 census lookup request
« Reply #32 on: Tuesday 02 December 08 20:42 GMT (UK) »
They are two distinct batches -
1) children of Edward and Mary at Deeping.
2) children of Mary at Spalding - Frances, John and Bales (died 1839)

Regarding Caroline, father named as Edward HOOTON.  The transcription I have (from the register, not from GRO index) is Caroline Hooton WISHLADE (see Bourne spreadsheet - here http://s10.freefronthost.com/mi/index.html )
My suspicion is that the names were accidentally transposed as the other kids were Wishlade HOOTON.
Don't cry because its over. Smile because it happened.

Offline heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,868
    • View Profile
Re: 1861 census lookup request
« Reply #33 on: Tuesday 02 December 08 20:49 GMT (UK) »
Thanks Geoff - I'm still struggling.
Do you think that there are two Marys then? It's odd that they are both Wishlade.

Regarding Caroline's marriage though - as she is married with the main surname of Wishlade and the middle name of Hooton that may mean that the parents are not married- do you think?
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline GeoffE

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,995
  • Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1861 census lookup request
« Reply #34 on: Tuesday 02 December 08 21:15 GMT (UK) »
I'm struggling too ... have you seen that submitted IGI entry for Selena HOOTEN 1831?  A total red herring ... or of relevance?
Don't cry because its over. Smile because it happened.

Offline heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,868
    • View Profile
Re: 1861 census lookup request
« Reply #35 on: Tuesday 02 December 08 21:24 GMT (UK) »
I know  ??? She is in 1841 census with the family; then she is christened (records) in 1849 and as someone has quoted her death in USA - that must be fairly accurate I suppose.
I wondered (I do a lot of that on Rootschat - ponder and wonder  ;)) if she and Elizabeth were baptised before they were going to be married perhaps ?
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk