France: Anne L'Homme, born Echiselle

[davidqueneherve]

No luck finding the baptism of Paul Pezze to see if there's a link as above, but I've found a few more children of Judit Menou and Pierre des Rats:

p 15: Pierre (who we knew already, can't remember if baptism already linked to?) b 1617 (I think)  parrain Josue Menou, marraine Judit des Rats

p 16:  Anne, b c. 1619 (very hard to read) parrain Jacques Brunet, marraine ?? (Jacques Brunet is married to Susanne Menou)

p 17: b. 1621 Ester (who we already knew about) Parrain is ?? Pezze, marraine Ester des Rats

p19: b. 1624 ?? Suzanne. parrain Paul Menou, marraine

p 21: b. 1626 Marie (who we already knew about) parrain Jacques Menou, marraine Marie

p 22: b. 1628 Josue parrain Jacques de galloy marrain Renee


Also... I'm on page 31 of 68 (around 1640) and there are no L'Homme family members mentioned. I wonder if they perhaps came from elsewhere, and Claude senior is the first one to come here?

 16:  Anne, b c. 1619 (very hard to read) parrain Jacques Brunet, marraine ?? (Jacques Brunet is married to Susanne Menou)

Godmother : may be Anne RENAUT

p 17: b. 1621 Ester (who we already knew about) Parrain is ?? Pezze, marraine Ester des Rats

Godfather Pierre PEZZE

p19: b. 1624 ?? Suzanne. parrain Paul Menou, marraine

Godmother : Suzanne BRUNET

p 21: b. 1626 Marie (who we already knew about) parrain Jacques Menou, marraine Marie

Godmother Marie FOUEST or a name alike

p 22: b. 1628 Josue parrain Jacques de galloy marrain Renee

Godmother damoiselle Renée DU, DE or DES SOUCHAIS ?

[davidqueneherve]

Marie RENAULT wife of Jacques MENOU

http://gw.geneanet.org/ecouvret?lang=fr&pz=ellen&nz=couvret&ocz=0&p=marie&n=regnault&oc=10

http://gw.geneanet.org/janoumenot?lang=fr&iz=83623&p=marie+2&n=regnault

http://gw.geneanet.org/mweisgerber?lang=fr&iz=8727&p=marie&n=renault&oc=3

[joger]

http://www.archives28.fr/arkotheque/visionneuse/visionneuse.php?arko=YTo2OntzOjQ6ImRhdGUiO3M6MTA6IjIwMTctMDgtMjciO3M6MTA6InR5cGVfZm9uZHMiO3M6MTE6ImFya29fc2VyaWVsIjtzOjQ6InJlZjEiO2k6MjtzOjQ6InJlZjIiO2k6NjE0ODtzOjE2OiJ2aXNpb25uZXVzZV9odG1sIjtiOjE7czoyMToidmlzaW9ubmV1c2VfaHRtbF9tb2RlIjtzOjQ6InByb2QiO30#uielem_move=-368%2C-274&uielem_islocked=0&uielem_zoom=123&uielem_brightness=0&uielem_contrast=0&uielem_isinverted=0&uielem_rotate=F

Frame 36



Christening of Madalene DELOUME, daughter of Claude LHOUME and Simonne DROIN

I read :The year being 1695 ( as written on the first record page 28)
le ving cinq ième jour de novembre ....magdeleine de lhomme issue du mariage de claude delhomme et simonne drouin a été baptisée le même jour par moi sous signé curé de cette paroisse  le parrain a été messire gaston de tranchillion seigneur de la tourneuve(see here page 10  :http://racineshistoire.free.fr/LGN/PDF/Tranchelion.pdf).... et la marraine madeleine agard femme de messire achile de Long... ... de la paroisse d'Arigny?) .... qui on signé

marriage record of gaston de tranchillion 1695 november 24th page 36

[JenNZL]

Is it wishful thinking on my part that I read "francoise" just before the "madeleine" ? Definitely looks like there's an f in there (immediately below the c of cinq), though I have no idea what the first few letters of that second line say - perhaps the f belongs to those words instead.

 

[joger]

Is it wishful thinking on my part that I read "francoise" just before the "madeleine" ? Definitely looks like there's an f in there (immediately below the c of cinq), though I have no idea what the first few letters of that second line say - perhaps the f belongs to those words instead.

You're right it could be françoise, but I am puzzled about what comes before this word , this handwriting is terrible

It is fransoize , I compared with another more easily readible fransoize.

[JenNZL]

I have no idea if this would even make grammatical sense, but there's no chance it could be "a este nee" ? As in, it's recording both her birth and baptism? I only wonder this because of the bit that says "la meme jour" later on - the same day as what?

[joger]

I have no idea if this would even make grammatical sense, but there's no chance it could be "a este nee" ? As in, it's recording both her birth and baptism? I only wonder this because of the bit that says "la meme jour" later on - the same day as what?

yes it must be "été née..." on the same day than the baptism

[joger]

Looking more closely to the name of Anne (wife of the third Claude Lhomme) , I think that her surname was Tuvin
In 1717 the curate name Reverend writes her name like this :J'ay curé d'ici baptisé...,

[joger]

And look how he writes Thomas and Jacques