Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Janet Waterhouse

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 ... 26
28
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Surname and abode 17th-century Batley burial BT'S
« on: Tuesday 15 August 23 12:11 BST (UK)  »
Good afternoon,

this time a surname and abode to decipher in the following 1641 entry.

Alverey ? of Ozuwell bured [buried] December 28 [1641]

The parish register page is missing for this year.

Thank you for taking the time to look.

Regards,

Janet

29
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: Occupation? 17th-century Batley burial BT'S
« on: Tuesday 15 August 23 12:05 BST (UK)  »
Thank you to all who responded.

Once explained it becomes obvious.

Regards,

Janet

30
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Occupation? 17th-century Batley burial BT'S
« on: Tuesday 15 August 23 10:30 BST (UK)  »
Good morning,

I am struggling with a possible occupation or maybe, unlikely abode, in the following 1641 entry.

Robrt [Robert] Shine Atrunxer bured [buried] May 13 [1641]

The parish register page is missing for this year.

Thank you for taking the time to look.

Regards,

Janet

31
The Common Room / Re: "Poor" written after a baptism entry
« on: Tuesday 25 July 23 16:10 BST (UK)  »
Good afternoon,

thank you for your contribution, I appreciate your time taken to respond and answers forwarded, which I have taken on board.

Regards,

Janet

32
The Common Room / Re: "Poor" written after a baptism entry
« on: Monday 24 July 23 10:02 BST (UK)  »
Thank you for your reply Emeltom.

I would tend to agree with you,however, so far, I have found two farmers, a schoolteacher and a local landed gentleman declared as poor!

Janet

33
The Common Room / "Poor" written after a baptism entry
« on: Monday 24 July 23 09:18 BST (UK)  »
Good morning,

I have come across the word "Poor" written after some baptism entries in an 1800-1812 baptism register.

Can you explain the significance, and/or the specific reason why Poor was written after an entry.

Regards,

Janet

34
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: 1605 Latin/English burial transcription
« on: Saturday 24 June 23 10:47 BST (UK)  »
Good morning Clayton and DRH123,

thank you for responding.

I was unable to request a copy of Mr. Redmonds' book through my local library, reference copy only.  So I went onto the Amazon website and purchased a copy from Music Magpie for the princely sum of £1.05 plus postage.  The 'as new', with dust jacket, book arrived this morning.

On consulting the pages referenced by Clayton, I agree that Maier can be interpreted as Maje(o)r, also suggested by David, and does make sense for a first name, which I have come across many times before.

I thank all who contributed answers to this query.

Regards,

Janet


35
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: 1605 Latin/English burial transcription
« on: Wednesday 21 June 23 09:43 BST (UK)  »
Thank you ptdrifter for your response.

I must say I have never come across this first name before.

Regards,

Janet

36
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / 1605 Latin/English burial transcription
« on: Monday 19 June 23 12:51 BST (UK)  »
Good afternoon,

can you please check and confirm whether I have translated the burial entry correctly:

1605 August 27 Uxor [Wife of] Maier [Mayor] Marshall buried August the 27 day.

The word I am not too sure about is Maier.

The BT's, of All Saint's, Parish Church, Batley, for this date are missing.

Thank you for taking the time to look.

Regards,

Janet

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 ... 26